Free during beta —to track favorites + alerts
FINAL+17IND
POR

POR

2-3

7390
IND

IND

3-2

Historical comparables

Games like this · top 6 from 369 candidates

basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year

WNBAWed, May 20FinalSeriesIND leads series 1-0VegasIND -10.5

Recap · WNBA

ndiana Fever held off Portland Fire, 90–73.

IND -10.5 cashed (won by 17). Total stayed UNDER 175.5 by 12.5.

ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page

WNBA · Portland Fire at Indiana Fever · final

WNBA · Box scoreTRACKING

Final
73
90
POR2-3IND3-2
POR

POR

2-3

73
CoreReboundsPlaymakingDefenseDiscipline
PlayerMINPTSREBASTSTLBLKTO+/-
251630300-21
21520001-27
20010011-21
22411002-16
241414103-9
18460120-1
17620100+10
8421001+4
13631000+6
198611000
14611104-10
Team732898312
DNP: K. Smalls, K. Samuelson
IND

IND

3-2

90
CoreReboundsPlaymakingDefenseDiscipline
PlayerMINPTSREBASTSTLBLKTO+/-
21941111+1
212483215+22
282124002+25
29017200+17
221681011+25
18733112-2
20250000+11
15221000-1
22931013-8
Team9036216514
DNP: D. Dantas, C. Clark

Stat compare

Headline stats · full table below

44

FG %

45

9

Ast

21

Season series

IND leads series 1-0

May 20PORPOR73@INDIND90today
May 31INDIND@PORPORupcoming
Aug 1INDIND@PORPORupcoming

Vegas line center

DraftKings via ESPN · 21+

Spread

IND -10.5

Half-pt above key 10

Total

175.5

High-scoring · +10.5 vs avg

Moneyline

PORPOR+36022%
INDIND-47082%

Implied probabilities back-computed from American odds — break-even win % a moneyline bet needs to be +EV.

Line movement · 200 snapshots

ESPN-tracked · 21+

Spread

10.5

0.0 since open

Total

175.5

0.0 since open

Headlines · top performers

Game flowPOR IND
PORPOR
B. Carleton

B. Carleton

F

Game leader · 25 min

16 PTS · 3 REB · 0 AST

INDIND
A. Boston

A. Boston

C

Game leader · 21 min

24 PTS · 8 REB · 3 AST

How it ended

IND beat POR 90-73. A. Boston led with 24 PTS, 8 REB, 3 AST. IND outscored the other side 28-20 in the 1st quarter.

Last play

End of Game

Win probability

IND vs POR

0255075100Q2Q3Q4

Starters vs bench

production by unit
PORPORstarters 53% of pts

Starters(5)

39 PTS · 8 REB · 5 AST

GS 19

Bench(6)

34 PTS · 20 REB · 4 AST

GS 24

INDINDstarters 78% of pts

Starters(5)

70 PTS · 23 REB · 16 AST

GS 62

Bench(5)

20 PTS · 13 REB · 5 AST

GS 9

Linescore (quarters)

Team1234T
POR2017142273
IND2825201790

Period scoring

POR won 1 · IND won 3

20
28

Q1

Leite 6

Boston 9

17
25

Q2

Carleton 7

Mitchell 9

14
20

Q3

Carleton 4

Boston 7

22
17

Q4

Sutton 6

Hull 8

POR
IND

Shooting comparison

POR
IND

44%

27-62

FG

45%

28-62

19%

3-16

3PT

32%

9-28

94%

16-17

FT

86%

25-29

Play-by-play · 417 plays

period
event
player
  1. Q4·0.0

    End of Game

    POR 73·IND 90

  2. Q4·0.0

    End of the 4th Quarter

    POR 73·IND 90

  3. Q4·1.3

    shot clock turnover

    POR 73·IND 90

  4. Q4·25.2

    Holly Winterburn makes 2-foot two point shot (Sug Sutton assists)

    ·

    POR 73·IND 90

  5. Q4·31.8

    Megan Gustafson defensive rebound

    POR 71·IND 90

  6. Q4·34.8

    Raven Johnson misses 26-foot three point jumper

    POR 71·IND 90

  7. Q4·49.1

    Serah Williams makes 3-foot reverse layup (Holly Winterburn assists)

    ·

    POR 71·IND 90

  8. Q4·57.4

    Megan Gustafson defensive rebound

    POR 69·IND 90

  9. Q4·1:00

    Tyasha Harris misses 27-foot three point jumper

    POR 69·IND 90

  10. Q4·1:01

    Makayla Timpson offensive rebound

    POR 69·IND 90

  11. Q4·1:04

    Raven Johnson misses 9-foot step back jumpshot

    POR 69·IND 90

  12. Q4·1:19

    Holly Winterburn out of bounds bad pass turnover

    POR 69·IND 90

  13. Q4·1:22

    Holly Winterburn defensive rebound

    POR 69·IND 90

  14. Q4·1:25

    Raven Johnson misses 26-foot three point jumper

    POR 69·IND 90

  15. Q4·1:49

    Haley Jones makes two point shot

    POR 69·IND 90

  16. Q4·1:50

    Haley Jones offensive rebound

    POR 67·IND 90

  17. Q4·1:52

    Holly Winterburn misses 26-foot running jump shot

    POR 67·IND 90

  18. Q4·1:57

    Serah Williams defensive rebound

    POR 67·IND 90

  19. Q4·1:59

    Raven Johnson misses 26-foot three point jumper

    POR 67·IND 90

  20. Q4·2:18

    Sug Sutton makes 7-foot pullup jump shot

    POR 67·IND 90

  21. Q4·2:24

    Serah Williams defensive rebound

    POR 65·IND 90

  22. Q4·2:29

    Tyasha Harris misses 17-foot pullup jump shot

    POR 65·IND 90

  23. Q4·2:42

    Sug Sutton out of bounds bad pass turnover

    POR 65·IND 90

  24. Q4·2:52

    Raven Johnson makes 25-foot three point jumper (Tyasha Harris assists)

    ·

    POR 65·IND 90

  25. Q4·3:06

    Monique Billings defensive rebound

    POR 65·IND 87

  26. Q4·3:08

    Haley Jones misses running layup

    POR 65·IND 87

  27. Q4·3:13

    Holly Winterburn defensive rebound

    POR 65·IND 87

  28. Q4·3:15

    Tyasha Harris misses 24-foot three point jumper

    POR 65·IND 87

  29. Q4·3:18

    Fever Full timeout

    POR 65·IND 87

  30. Q4·3:18

    Monique Billings enters the game for Lexie Hull

    ·

    POR 65·IND 87

Team stats

POR

Away

Stat

IND

Home

27-62

fieldGoalsMade-fieldGoalsAttempted

28-62

44

FG %

45

3-16

threePointFieldGoalsMade-threePointFieldGoalsAttempted

9-28

16-17

freeThrowsMade-freeThrowsAttempted

25-29

9

Assists

21

12

Turnovers

14

Betting line

IND -10.5·O/U 175.5·POR +360/IND -470

DraftKings · via ESPN

Model ensemble · how the prediction is built

3 sub-models, blended.

Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.

27.3%

ensemble · POR favored

  • Elo Static

    fallback · inputs missing

    50.0%

    P(IND win)

    30%

    weight

  • Elo Recent

    fallback · inputs missing

    50.0%

    P(IND win)

    37%

    weight

  • Pace Efficiency

    fallback · inputs missing

    50.0%

    P(IND win)

    33%

    weight

Disagreement

0.00 pp

weighted σ across sub-models

Confidence

100% · high

maps from disagreement

Substrate count

0 / 3 active

ones with full inputs tonight

Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.

The receipts

Closing-line value.

+0.47

CLV pp

Open price

+625

Close price

+600

Open no-vig

13.2%

Close no-vig

13.7%

Line barely moved · Graded: miss

Player projections

IND vs POR.

Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.

110

projections · 0 high confidence

Points

  • Caitlin ClarkIND
    19.4± 9.7low
  • Kelsey MitchellIND
    19.3± 7.5low
  • Carla LeitePOR
    14.7± 6.8low

Rebounds

  • Aliyah BostonIND
    6.6± 6.4low
  • Monique BillingsIND
    5.1± 3.3low
  • Sarah Ashlee BarkerPOR
    4.6± 3.6low

Assists

  • Caitlin ClarkIND
    7.0± 3.5low
  • Carla LeitePOR
    4.0± 3.2low
  • Aliyah BostonIND
    3.1± 2.1low

Blocks

  • Emily EngstlerPOR
    2.4± 1.8low
  • Caitlin ClarkIND
    0.8± 0.9low
  • Aliyah BostonIND
    0.7± 1.0low

Steals

  • Bridget CarletonPOR
    2.0± 1.5low
  • Emily EngstlerPOR
    1.3± 1.8low
  • Aliyah BostonIND
    1.1± 1.6low

Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands

Matchup · 2026

Team rate stats vs league

wehoop

POR

POR

league avg

IND

IND

45.1%

FG%

44.9

45.4%

33.9%

3PT %

33.0

32.1%

83.8

PPG

86.0

92.9

18.4

Assists / G

18.0

22.3

13.5

Turnovers / G

13.0

14.4

Data via ESPN · wehoop