Free during beta —to track favorites + alerts
FINAL+9LA
IND

IND

17-13

91100
LA

LA

13-15

Historical comparables

Games like this · top 6 from 310 candidates

basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year

WNBATue, Aug 5FinalSeriesLA wins series 3-1

Recap · WNBA

os Angeles Sparks held off Indiana Fever, 100–91.

ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.

ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page

WNBA · Indiana Fever at Los Angeles Sparks · final

WNBA · Box scoreTRACKING

Final
91
100
IND17-13LA13-15
IND

IND

17-13

91
CoreReboundsPlaymakingDefenseDiscipline
PlayerMINPTSREBASTSTLBLKTO+/-
321772010+3
341594010-3
313426102+3
26812200-11
301556001+1
13001000-17
21021101-4
Team912723424
DNP: B. Turner, C. Clark
LA

LA

13-15

100
CoreReboundsPlaymakingDefenseDiscipline
PlayerMINPTSREBASTSTLBLKTO+/-
291673001-2
261951020-7
322552000+10
3425111003+15
32587002+6
16030052+12
10300002+2
17731101+14
Team10032251711
DNP: E. Cannon, S. Feagin, A. Pili

Stat compare

Headline stats · full table below

44

FG %

56

23

Ast

25

Season series

LA wins series 3-1

Jun 26LALA85@INDIND75
Jul 5LALA89@INDIND87
Aug 6INDIND91@LALA100today
Aug 30INDIND76@LALA75

Headlines · top performers

Game flowIND LA

Biggest swing: 9pp · 1st Quarter · 4:49

INDIND
K. Mitchell

K. Mitchell

G

Game leader · 31 min30+ point game

34 PTS · 2 REB · 6 AST

LALA
K. Plum

K. Plum

G

Game leader · 34 min

25 PTS · 1 REB · 11 AST

How it ended

LA beat IND 100-91. K. Plum paced them with 25 PTS, 1 REB, 11 AST. LA outscored the other side 28-16 in the 2nd quarter.

Last play

End of Game

Win probability

LA vs IND

0255075100Q2Q3Q4

Starters vs bench

production by unit
INDINDstarters 98% of pts

Starters(5)

89 PTS · 24 REB · 20 AST

GS 77

Bench(5)

2 PTS · 3 REB · 3 AST

LALAstarters 90% of pts

Starters(5)

90 PTS · 26 REB · 24 AST

GS 82

Bench(4)

10 PTS · 6 REB · 1 AST

GS 4

Clutch moments · top swings

ranked by WP impact
IND1st Quarter · 4:49 · 17-15
+9pp63% WP

Natasha Howard · makes free throw 1 of 2

LA2nd Quarter · 4:53 · 36-42
+7pp66% WP

Julie Vanloo · makes 26-foot three pointer (Dearica Hamby assists)

LA3rd Quarter · 4:32 · 59-68
+7pp82% WP

Kelsey Plum · makes 26-foot three point jumper (Julie Allemand assists)

Linescore (quarters)

Team1234T
IND2716212791
LA26282224100

Period scoring

IND won 2 · LA won 2

27
26

Q1

Mitchell 10

Jackson 8

16
28

Q2

Cunningham 5

Hamby 10

21
22

Q3

Mitchell 11

Jackson 10

27
24

Q4

McDonald 11

Jackson 7

IND
LA

Shooting comparison

IND
LA

44%

34-77

FG

56%

37-66

36%

12-33

3PT

50%

13-26

85%

11-13

FT

87%

13-15

Play-by-play · 363 plays

period
event
player
  1. Q4·0.0

    End of Game

    IND 91·LA 100

  2. Q4·0.0

    End of the 4th Quarter

    IND 91·LA 100

  3. Q4·19.6

    Kelsey Plum makes free throw 2 of 2

    IND 91·LA 100

  4. Q4·19.6

    Makayla Timpson enters the game for Natasha Howard

    ·

    IND 91·LA 99

  5. Q4·19.6

    Sydney Colson enters the game for Aliyah Boston

    ·

    IND 91·LA 99

  6. Q4·19.6

    Chloe Bibby enters the game for Kelsey Mitchell

    ·

    IND 91·LA 99

  7. Q4·19.6

    Kelsey Plum makes free throw 1 of 2

    IND 91·LA 99

  8. Q4·19.6

    Lexie Hull personal foul

    IND 91·LA 98

  9. Q4·20.5

    Azura Stevens defensive rebound

    IND 91·LA 98

  10. Q4·23.0

    Natasha Howard misses 27-foot three point step back jumpshot

    IND 91·LA 98

    +2pp

  11. Q4·38.8

    Kelsey Plum bad pass (Lexie Hull steals)

    ·

    IND 91·LA 98

    0.8pp

  12. Q4·56.3

    Kelsey Mitchell makes free throw 2 of 2

    IND 91·LA 98

    +2pp

  13. Q4·56.3

    Natasha Howard enters the game for Sophie Cunningham

    ·

    IND 90·LA 98

  14. Q4·56.3

    Kelsey Mitchell makes free throw 1 of 2

    IND 90·LA 98

  15. Q4·56.3

    Dearica Hamby shooting foul

    IND 89·LA 98

    2pp

  16. Q4·1:02

    Sophie Cunningham enters the game for Natasha Howard

    ·

    IND 89·LA 98

  17. Q4·1:02

    Fever Full timeout

    IND 89·LA 98

    +2pp

  18. Q4·1:02

    Dearica Hamby personal foul

    IND 89·LA 98

    2pp

  19. Q4·1:17

    Azura Stevens makes 22-foot three point jumper (Julie Allemand assists)

    ·

    IND 89·LA 98

    +3pp

  20. Q4·1:30

    Azura Stevens defensive rebound

    IND 89·LA 95

    +0.8pp

  21. Q4·1:34

    Kelsey Mitchell misses 25-foot three point jumper

    IND 89·LA 95

    +2pp

  22. Q4·1:44

    Aliyah Boston defensive rebound

    IND 89·LA 95

    0.5pp

  23. Q4·1:49

    Julie Allemand misses 26-foot three point jumper

    IND 89·LA 95

    2pp

  24. Q4·2:09

    Aari McDonald makes 27-foot three point shot (Kelsey Mitchell assists)

    ·

    IND 89·LA 95

    3pp

  25. Q4·2:14

    Natasha Howard defensive rebound

    IND 86·LA 95

  26. Q4·2:16

    Rickea Jackson misses layup

    IND 86·LA 95

  27. Q4·2:37

    Aari McDonald makes 24-foot three point jumper (Kelsey Mitchell assists)

    ·

    IND 86·LA 95

    0.8pp

  28. Q4·2:38

    Aliyah Boston offensive rebound

    IND 83·LA 95

  29. Q4·2:40

    Aliyah Boston misses layup

    IND 83·LA 95

  30. Q4·2:53

    Official timeout

    IND 83·LA 95

Team stats

IND

Away

Stat

LA

Home

34-77

fieldGoalsMade-fieldGoalsAttempted

37-66

44

FG %

56

12-33

threePointFieldGoalsMade-threePointFieldGoalsAttempted

13-26

11-13

freeThrowsMade-freeThrowsAttempted

13-15

23

Assists

25

4

Turnovers

11

Model ensemble · how the prediction is built

3 sub-models, blended.

Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.

27.3%

ensemble · IND favored

  • Elo Static

    fallback · inputs missing

    50.0%

    P(LA win)

    30%

    weight

  • Elo Recent

    fallback · inputs missing

    50.0%

    P(LA win)

    37%

    weight

  • Pace Efficiency

    fallback · inputs missing

    50.0%

    P(LA win)

    33%

    weight

Disagreement

0.00 pp

weighted σ across sub-models

Confidence

100% · high

maps from disagreement

Substrate count

0 / 3 active

ones with full inputs tonight

Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.

Player projections

LA vs IND.

Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.

115

projections · 0 high confidence

Points

  • Kelsey PlumLA
    24.5± 10.4low
  • Caitlin ClarkIND
    19.4± 9.7low
  • Kelsey MitchellIND
    19.3± 7.5low

Rebounds

  • Dearica HambyLA
    6.9± 5.0low
  • Nneka OgwumikeLA
    6.9± 3.6low
  • Aliyah BostonIND
    6.6± 6.4low

Assists

  • Caitlin ClarkIND
    7.0± 3.5low
  • Kelsey PlumLA
    5.5± 3.9low
  • Erica WheelerLA
    5.1± 3.3low

Blocks

  • Cameron BrinkLA
    1.6± 1.4low
  • Caitlin ClarkIND
    0.8± 0.9low
  • Aliyah BostonIND
    0.7± 1.0low

Steals

  • Ariel AtkinsLA
    1.7± 1.7low
  • Dearica HambyLA
    1.4± 1.9low
  • Erica WheelerLA
    1.2± 1.3low

Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands

Matchup · 2026

Team rate stats vs league

wehoop

IND

IND

league avg

LA

LA

45.4%

FG%

44.9

50.8%

32.1%

3PT %

33.0

35.0%

92.9

PPG

86.0

91.5

22.3

Assists / G

18.0

20.8

14.4

Turnovers / G

13.0

16.8

Data via ESPN · wehoop