Free during beta —to track favorites + alerts
FINAL+2LA
LA

LA

6-13

8987
IND

IND

9-9

Historical comparables

Games like this · top 6 from 310 candidates

basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year

WNBASat, Jul 5FinalSeriesLA wins series 3-1

Recap · WNBA

os Angeles Sparks went into Indiana Fever and beat them, 89–87. Decided by 2.

ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.

ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page

WNBA · Los Angeles Sparks at Indiana Fever · final

WNBA · Box scoreTRACKING

Final
89
87
LA6-13IND9-9
LA

LA

6-13

89
CoreReboundsPlaymakingDefenseDiscipline
PlayerMINPTSREBASTSTLBLKTO+/-
321834103+7
29211220000
331525112+6
372033001-1
30565001+9
11010000+2
8511000-5
10302000-7
11220000-1
Team893022217
DNP: C. Brink, S. Feagin, S. Barker
IND

IND

9-9

87
CoreReboundsPlaymakingDefenseDiscipline
PlayerMINPTSREBASTSTLBLKTO+/-
362193124+2
3223124021-3
3119000000
30418101-4
22521001-13
12560012-2
15625010+1
23411100+9
Team873322369
DNP: B. Turner, C. Clark

Stat compare

Headline stats · full table below

49

FG %

49

22

Ast

22

Season series

LA wins series 3-1

Jun 26LALA85@INDIND75
Jul 5LALA89@INDIND87today
Aug 6INDIND91@LALA100
Aug 30INDIND76@LALA75

Headlines · top performers

Game flowLA IND

Biggest swing: 18pp · 4th Quarter · 4.2

LALA
A. Stevens

A. Stevens

F

Game leader · 29 min

21 PTS · 12 REB · 2 AST

INDIND
A. Boston

A. Boston

C

Game leader · 32 min

23 PTS · 12 REB · 4 AST

How it ended

LA beat IND 89-87. A. Stevens led with 21 PTS, 12 REB, 2 AST. Lexie Hull's play in the 4th quarter drove the biggest swing of the night (18pp).

Last play

End of Game

Win probability

IND vs LA

0255075100Q2Q3Q4

Starters vs bench

production by unit
LALAstarters 89% of pts

Starters(5)

79 PTS · 26 REB · 19 AST

GS 63

Bench(4)

10 PTS · 4 REB · 3 AST

GS 4

INDINDstarters 83% of pts

Starters(5)

72 PTS · 24 REB · 16 AST

GS 53

Bench(3)

15 PTS · 9 REB · 6 AST

GS 14

Clutch moments · top swings

ranked by WP impact
LA4th Quarter · 1:31 · 85-87
+16pp43% WP

Natasha Howard · shooting foul

IND4th Quarter · 30.1 · 88-87
+13pp46% WP

Julie Allemand · bad pass (Aari McDonald steals)

LA4th Quarter · 4.2 · 88-87
+18pp84% WP

Lexie Hull · misses 7-foot jumper

Linescore (quarters)

Team1234T
LA2121281989
IND2322241887

Period scoring

LA won 2 · IND won 2

21
23

Q1

Stevens 7

Mitchell 8

21
22

Q2

Plum 8

Howard 6

28
24

Q3

Hamby 10

Howard 11

19
18

Q4

Jackson 7

Boston 6

LA
IND

Shooting comparison

LA
IND

49%

32-65

FG

49%

34-70

45%

10-22

3PT

35%

7-20

65%

15-23

FT

63%

12-19

Play-by-play · 391 plays

period
event
player
  1. Q4·0.0

    End of Game

    LA 89·IND 87

  2. Q4·0.0

    End of the 4th Quarter

    LA 89·IND 87

    0.9pp

  3. Q4·0.1

    Fever offensive team rebound

    LA 89·IND 87

  4. Q4·0.1

    Aliyah Boston misses 21-foot pullup jump shot

    LA 89·IND 87

    5pp

  5. Q4·2.1

    Lexie Hull enters the game for Natasha Howard

    ·

    LA 89·IND 87

  6. Q4·2.1

    Fever timeout

    LA 89·IND 87

  7. Q4·2.1

    Aliyah Boston defensive rebound

    LA 89·IND 87

    2pp

  8. Q4·3.1

    Azura Stevens misses free throw 2 of 2BIG MOMENT

    LA 89·IND 87

    +5pp

  9. Q4·3.1

    Natasha Howard enters the game for Lexie Hull

    ·

    LA 89·IND 87

  10. Q4·3.1

    Azura Stevens makes free throw 1 of 2

    LA 89·IND 87

    0.7pp

  11. Q4·3.1

    Sydney Colson enters the game for Aari McDonald

    ·

    LA 88·IND 87

  12. Q4·3.1

    Aari McDonald personal take foulBIG MOMENT

    LA 88·IND 87

    7pp

  13. Q4·3.1

    Azura Stevens defensive reboundBIG MOMENT

    LA 88·IND 87

    6pp

  14. Q4·4.2

    Lexie Hull misses 7-foot jumperBIG MOMENT

    LA 88·IND 87

    18pp

  15. Q4·7.1

    Lexie Hull offensive rebound

    LA 88·IND 87

    +2pp

  16. Q4·10.1

    Aari McDonald misses 24-foot three point jumperBIG MOMENT

    LA 88·IND 87

    14pp

  17. Q4·24.1

    Mercedes Russell enters the game for Dearica Hamby

    ·

    LA 88·IND 87

  18. Q4·24.1

    Sophie Cunningham enters the game for Natasha Howard

    ·

    LA 88·IND 87

  19. Q4·24.1

    Fever Full timeout

    LA 88·IND 87

  20. Q4·30.1

    Julie Allemand bad pass (Aari McDonald steals)BIG MOMENT

    ·

    LA 88·IND 87

    +13pp

  21. Q4·41.0

    Dearica Hamby enters the game for Mercedes Russell

    ·

    LA 88·IND 87

  22. Q4·41.0

    Sparks Full timeout

    LA 88·IND 87

  23. Q4·41.0

    Azura Stevens defensive rebound

    LA 88·IND 87

    4pp

  24. Q4·43.1

    Aliyah Boston misses layupBIG MOMENT

    LA 88·IND 87

    11pp

  25. Q4·57.1

    Mercedes Russell enters the game for Dearica Hamby

    ·

    LA 88·IND 87

  26. Q4·57.1

    Fever Full timeout

    LA 88·IND 87

  27. Q4·58.0

    Rickea Jackson makes 2-foot two point shotBIG MOMENT

    LA 88·IND 87

    6pp

  28. Q4·1:11

    Azura Stevens defensive rebound

    LA 86·IND 87

    3pp

  29. Q4·1:12

    Kelsey Mitchell misses two point shotBIG MOMENT

    LA 86·IND 87

    9pp

  30. Q4·1:31

    Rickea Jackson makes free throw 1 of 1BIG MOMENT

    LA 86·IND 87

    +9pp

Team stats

LA

Away

Stat

IND

Home

32-65

fieldGoalsMade-fieldGoalsAttempted

34-70

49

FG %

49

10-22

threePointFieldGoalsMade-threePointFieldGoalsAttempted

7-20

15-23

freeThrowsMade-freeThrowsAttempted

12-19

22

Assists

22

7

Turnovers

9

Model ensemble · how the prediction is built

3 sub-models, blended.

Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.

27.3%

ensemble · LA favored

  • Elo Static

    fallback · inputs missing

    50.0%

    P(IND win)

    30%

    weight

  • Elo Recent

    fallback · inputs missing

    50.0%

    P(IND win)

    37%

    weight

  • Pace Efficiency

    fallback · inputs missing

    50.0%

    P(IND win)

    33%

    weight

Disagreement

0.00 pp

weighted σ across sub-models

Confidence

100% · high

maps from disagreement

Substrate count

0 / 3 active

ones with full inputs tonight

Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.

Player projections

IND vs LA.

Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.

115

projections · 0 high confidence

Points

  • Kelsey PlumLA
    24.5± 10.4low
  • Caitlin ClarkIND
    19.4± 9.7low
  • Kelsey MitchellIND
    19.3± 7.5low

Rebounds

  • Dearica HambyLA
    6.9± 5.0low
  • Nneka OgwumikeLA
    6.9± 3.6low
  • Aliyah BostonIND
    6.6± 6.4low

Assists

  • Caitlin ClarkIND
    7.0± 3.5low
  • Kelsey PlumLA
    5.5± 3.9low
  • Erica WheelerLA
    5.1± 3.3low

Blocks

  • Cameron BrinkLA
    1.6± 1.4low
  • Caitlin ClarkIND
    0.8± 0.9low
  • Aliyah BostonIND
    0.7± 1.0low

Steals

  • Ariel AtkinsLA
    1.7± 1.7low
  • Dearica HambyLA
    1.4± 1.9low
  • Erica WheelerLA
    1.2± 1.3low

Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands

Matchup · 2026

Team rate stats vs league

wehoop

LA

LA

league avg

IND

IND

50.7%

FG%

44.7

45.4%

34.3%

3PT %

32.6

32.1%

91.6

PPG

85.4

92.9

21.1

Assists / G

18.0

22.3

16.4

Turnovers / G

13.0

14.4

Data via ESPN · wehoop