Free during beta —to track favorites + alerts
FINAL+7CHI
CHI

CHI

5-11

9285
LA

LA

5-12

Historical comparables

Games like this · top 6 from 310 candidates

basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year

WNBASun, Jun 29FinalSeriesCHI wins series 2-1

Recap · WNBA

hicago Sky went into Los Angeles Sparks and beat them, 92–85.

ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.

ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page

WNBA · Chicago Sky at Los Angeles Sparks · final

WNBA · Box scoreTRACKING

Final
92
85
CHI5-11LA5-12
CHI

CHI

5-11

92
CoreReboundsPlaymakingDefenseDiscipline
PlayerMINPTSREBASTSTLBLKTO+/-
3824167124+3
351291321+20
281314101-2
19641011-7
372022122+8
241420002+13
Team9235226711
DNP: M. Westbeld
LA

LA

5-12

85
CoreReboundsPlaymakingDefenseDiscipline
PlayerMINPTSREBASTSTLBLKTO+/-
3720104313-5
261764134-19
28611001-13
23361000+1
352257202-4
141531000+12
17224001-8
17020112+3
Team8535227513
DNP: S. Feagin

Stat compare

Headline stats · full table below

49

FG %

42

22

Ast

22

Season series

CHI wins series 2-1

May 25CHICHI78@LALA91
Jun 25LALA86@CHICHI97
Jun 29CHICHI92@LALA85today

Headlines · top performers

Game flowCHI LA

Biggest swing: 15pp · 3rd Quarter · 3:26

CHICHI
A. Reese

A. Reese

F

Game leader · 38 min

24 PTS · 16 REB · 7 AST

LALA
D. Hamby

D. Hamby

F

Game leader · 37 min

20 PTS · 10 REB · 4 AST

How it ended

CHI beat LA 92-85. A. Reese led with 24 PTS, 16 REB, 7 AST. CHI outscored the other side 31-23 in the 4th quarter.

Last play

End of Game

Win probability

LA vs CHI

0255075100Q2Q3Q4

Starters vs bench

production by unit
CHICHIstarters 82% of pts

Starters(5)

75 PTS · 32 REB · 15 AST

GS 66

Bench(4)

17 PTS · 3 REB · 7 AST

GS 12

LALAstarters 80% of pts

Starters(5)

68 PTS · 28 REB · 17 AST

GS 55

Bench(4)

17 PTS · 7 REB · 5 AST

GS 11

Clutch moments · top swings

ranked by WP impact
CHI3rd Quarter · 4:37 · 53-51
+10pp52% WP

Michaela Onyenwere · makes 25-foot three point jumper (Rachel Banham assists)

LA3rd Quarter · 3:26 · 53-55
+15pp69% WP

Angel Reese · technical foul

CHI4th Quarter · 9:06 · 64-62
+12pp55% WP

Kia Nurse · makes 25-foot three point jumper (Angel Reese assists)

Linescore (quarters)

Team1234T
CHI1723213192
LA1816282385

Period scoring

CHI won 2 · LA won 2

17
18

Q1

Williams 8

Stevens 8

23
16

Q2

Banham 8

Hamby 4

21
28

Q3

Atkins 9

Cannon 10

31
23

Q4

Reese 11

Hamby 6

CHI
LA

Shooting comparison

CHI
LA

49%

33-68

FG

42%

30-72

42%

11-26

3PT

32%

9-28

88%

15-17

FT

73%

16-22

Play-by-play · 388 plays

period
event
player
  1. Q4·0.0

    End of Game

    CHI 92·LA 85

  2. Q4·0.0

    End of the 4th Quarter

    CHI 92·LA 85

  3. Q4·0.1

    Ariel Atkins lost ball turnover (Dearica Hamby steals)

    ·

    CHI 92·LA 85

  4. Q4·8.2

    Kelsey Plum makes 2-foot two point shot (Azura Stevens assists)

    ·

    CHI 92·LA 85

  5. Q4·14.0

    Michaela Onyenwere enters the game for Elizabeth Williams

    ·

    CHI 92·LA 83

  6. Q4·14.0

    Sparks Full timeout

    CHI 92·LA 83

  7. Q4·14.0

    Ariel Atkins makes free throw 2 of 2

    CHI 92·LA 83

  8. Q4·14.0

    Ariel Atkins makes free throw 1 of 2

    CHI 91·LA 83

  9. Q4·14.0

    Rickea Jackson personal foul

    CHI 90·LA 83

  10. Q4·16.1

    Rickea Jackson makes 1-foot layup (Dearica Hamby assists)

    ·

    CHI 90·LA 83

  11. Q4·21.1

    Sparks timeout

    CHI 90·LA 81

  12. Q4·21.1

    Rachel Banham makes free throw 2 of 2

    CHI 90·LA 81

  13. Q4·21.1

    Rachel Banham makes free throw 1 of 2

    CHI 89·LA 81

  14. Q4·21.1

    Odyssey Sims personal foul

    CHI 88·LA 81

  15. Q4·28.1

    Sky timeout

    CHI 88·LA 81

  16. Q4·28.1

    Kelsey Plum makes free throw 2 of 2

    CHI 88·LA 81

    1pp

  17. Q4·28.1

    Kelsey Plum makes free throw 1 of 2

    CHI 88·LA 80

  18. Q4·28.1

    Ariel Atkins personal foul

    CHI 88·LA 79

    +0.8pp

  19. Q4·37.1

    Ariel Atkins makes 23-foot three point jumper (Rachel Banham assists)

    ·

    CHI 88·LA 79

    0.7pp

  20. Q4·55.2

    Kelsey Plum personal foul

    CHI 85·LA 79

    3pp

  21. Q4·1:00

    Sky Full timeout

    CHI 85·LA 79

  22. Q4·1:00

    Azura Stevens makes two point shot

    CHI 85·LA 79

    +2pp

  23. Q4·1:02

    Azura Stevens offensive rebound

    CHI 85·LA 77

    +0.8pp

  24. Q4·1:04

    Azura Stevens misses two point shot

    CHI 85·LA 77

    0.9pp

  25. Q4·1:04

    Azura Stevens offensive rebound

    CHI 85·LA 77

    +0.9pp

  26. Q4·1:05

    Kelsey Plum misses 24-foot three point jumper

    CHI 85·LA 77

    1pp

  27. Q4·1:09

    Dearica Hamby offensive rebound

    CHI 85·LA 77

    +0.9pp

  28. Q4·1:11

    Kelsey Plum misses 29-foot three point step back jumpshot

    CHI 85·LA 77

    1pp

  29. Q4·1:18

    shot clock turnover

    CHI 85·LA 77

    +0.7pp

  30. Q4·1:43

    Azura Stevens makes free throw 1 of 1

    CHI 85·LA 77

    1pp

Team stats

CHI

Away

Stat

LA

Home

33-68

fieldGoalsMade-fieldGoalsAttempted

30-72

49

FG %

42

11-26

threePointFieldGoalsMade-threePointFieldGoalsAttempted

9-28

15-17

freeThrowsMade-freeThrowsAttempted

16-22

22

Assists

22

11

Turnovers

13

Model ensemble · how the prediction is built

3 sub-models, blended.

Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.

27.3%

ensemble · CHI favored

  • Elo Static

    fallback · inputs missing

    50.0%

    P(LA win)

    30%

    weight

  • Elo Recent

    fallback · inputs missing

    50.0%

    P(LA win)

    37%

    weight

  • Pace Efficiency

    fallback · inputs missing

    50.0%

    P(LA win)

    33%

    weight

Disagreement

0.00 pp

weighted σ across sub-models

Confidence

100% · high

maps from disagreement

Substrate count

0 / 3 active

ones with full inputs tonight

Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.

Player projections

LA vs CHI.

Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.

105

projections · 0 high confidence

Points

  • Kelsey PlumLA
    24.5± 10.4low
  • Nneka OgwumikeLA
    16.4± 5.3low
  • Rickea JacksonCHI
    16.0± 11.0low

Rebounds

  • Kamilla CardosoCHI
    8.5± 5.1low
  • Dearica HambyLA
    6.9± 5.0low
  • Nneka OgwumikeLA
    6.9± 3.6low

Assists

  • Kelsey PlumLA
    5.5± 3.9low
  • Skylar DigginsCHI
    5.4± 3.0low
  • Erica WheelerLA
    5.1± 3.3low

Blocks

  • Cameron BrinkLA
    1.6± 1.4low
  • Kamilla CardosoCHI
    1.2± 1.4low
  • Rickea JacksonCHI
    1.2± 1.6low

Steals

  • Ariel AtkinsLA
    1.7± 1.7low
  • Dearica HambyLA
    1.4± 1.9low
  • Aicha CoulibalyCHI
    1.3± 1.2low

Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands

Matchup · 2026

Team rate stats vs league

wehoop

CHI

CHI

league avg

LA

LA

41.1%

FG%

44.7

50.7%

25.9%

3PT %

32.6

34.3%

82.8

PPG

85.4

91.6

19.3

Assists / G

18.0

21.1

11.0

Turnovers / G

13.0

16.4

Data via ESPN · wehoop