
MIA
8-11-2

HOU
9-10-3
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
MIA
league avg
HOU
.711
OPS
.718
▶.726
.323
OBP
.319
.316
4.27
Runs / G
4.50
▶4.50
3.94
Team ERA
4.17
4.74
1.24
WHIP
1.31
1.40
8.6
K / 9
8.5
▶8.7
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
HOU wins
MIA 0 · HOU 1 (by 1)
Model verdict
No projection
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| HOU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
MIA · top performer
Abrahan Ramirez
2B
1-1
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
HOU · top performer

Shay Whitcomb
3B
3-1
AB-H
0
R
1
RBI
Biggest swing: 28pp · Bottom 8th Inning
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .333 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .148 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .233 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .226 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .147 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .273 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .115 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .045 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .174 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .200 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .500 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 30 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 53 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | |
| 1.2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 40 | |
| 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 119 |
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .172 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| .107 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .273 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .095 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .000 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .115 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .267 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .200 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .192 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .077 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .158 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .222 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .214 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .300 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 26 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 56 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 11 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | |
| 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 25 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 112 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantMIA
HOU
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
3
Hits
1
0
Runs
1
1
Errors
0
Team stats
MIA
Away
Stat
HOU
Home
0
Runs
1
3
Hits
1
1
Errors
0
3
TB
2
0
HR
0
2
BB
1
8
K
9
10
LOB
4
Season series
HOU leads series 4-1
How it ended
HOU beat MIA 1-0. S. Whitcomb led the way — 1-for-3 · 0.667 OPS. Whitcomb's play in the bottom 8th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (28pp).
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactWhitcomb · doubled to left, Matthews scored.
Conine · struck out swinging.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| HOU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — | 1 |
Recap · MLB
ouston Astros held off Miami Marlins, 1–0. It came down to the final possession.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
Win probability
HOU vs MIA
Period scoring
MIA won 0 · HOU won 1
Inn 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Inn 5
Inn 6
Inn 7
Inn 8
Whitcomb 1
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 469 plays
· ·
MIA 0·HOU 1
Vargas struck out looking.BIG MOMENT
· ·
MIA 0·HOU 1
+8pp
Pitch 5 : Strike 3 Looking
· ·
MIA 0·HOU 1
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
MIA 0·HOU 1
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
· ·
MIA 0·HOU 1
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
MIA 0·HOU 1
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
MIA 0·HOU 1
AJ Blubaugh pitches to Echedry Vargas
· ·
MIA 0·HOU 1
· ·
MIA 0·HOU 1
Conine struck out swinging.BIG MOMENT
· ·
MIA 0·HOU 1
+11pp
Pitch 3 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
MIA 0·HOU 1
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
MIA 0·HOU 1
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
· ·
MIA 0·HOU 1
AJ Blubaugh pitches to Griffin Conine
· ·
MIA 0·HOU 1
·
MIA 0·HOU 1
Ab. Ramirez singled to center.BIG MOMENT
·
MIA 0·HOU 1
−8pp
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
MIA 0·HOU 1
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
MIA 0·HOU 1
AJ Blubaugh pitches to Abrahan Ramirez
·
MIA 0·HOU 1
·
MIA 0·HOU 1
Morlando struck out swinging.BIG MOMENT
·
MIA 0·HOU 1
+7pp
Pitch 6 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
MIA 0·HOU 1
Pitch 5 : Ball 2
·
MIA 0·HOU 1
Pitch 4 : Ball 1
·
MIA 0·HOU 1
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
·
MIA 0·HOU 1
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
MIA 0·HOU 1
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
MIA 0·HOU 1
AJ Blubaugh pitches to PJ Morlando
·
MIA 0·HOU 1
Price at first base.
MIA 0·HOU 1
Top of the 9th inning
MIA 0·HOU 1
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
50.3%
ensemble · HOU favored
Elo Static
fallback · inputs missing
50.0%
P(HOU win)
34%
weight
Elo Pitching
fallback · inputs missing
50.0%
P(HOU win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
fallback · inputs missing
50.0%
P(HOU win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.00 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
100% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
0 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
125
projections · 93 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands