
ATL
33-16

MIA
22-27
Line movement
200 snapshots
MIA spread
+1.5
open +1.5
Total
O/U 8.5
open O/U 8.0 · +0.5
MIA no-vig %
44.9%
open 46.8% · -1.9
Stepped lines reflect captured market snapshots from odds_snapshots. Spread sign convention: negative = MIA favored. Live mode caps the in-game branch to the last 60 minutes.
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
ATL wins
ATL 8 · MIA 4 (by 4)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked ATL +12pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATL | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 8 |
| MIA | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Line shopping · 1 book
Same model, different prices. The same moneyline can vary 25¢ across books — taking the worst price wipes out a real edge instantly. Star marks the best-paying book per side.
+16.0pp
best edge · ATL · DraftKings
ATL
★ bestedge +16.0pp · implied 45.5%
MIA
no live price
| Book | ATL | MIA | Best edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| DraftKings | +106★ | -139 | +16.0 |
Edges shown are model probability minus no-vig implied probability for that side at that book. Stars mark the highest-paying cell per side. Lines refresh every 60 seconds.
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Recap · MLB
tlanta Braves went into Miami Marlins and beat them, 8–4.
ATL -1.5 cashed (won by 4). Total cleared the 8.0 OVER by 4.0.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
ATL · top performer

Chadwick Tromp
C
1-1
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
MIA · top performer

Liam Hicks
C
1-1
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


ATL
33-16
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-4 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
SPRINT26.838 | ||||||||
| 3-5 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT26.428 | ||||||||
| 2-3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
SPRINT25.513 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| 2-5 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.148 | ||||||||
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 10-36 | 36 | 8 | 10 | 8 | 1 | 8 | 11 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 5.0 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 1 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 13 | 1 |
MIA
22-27
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT2872 | ||||||||
| 3-4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.381 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT28.483 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT2622 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1-1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 8-35 | 35 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 13 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 3.0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | |
| 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 11 | 1 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantATL
MIA
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
10
Hits
8
8
Runs
4
1
Errors
0
Current series
ATL wins series 3-1
Season series
ATL leads series 3-2
Vegas line center
DraftKings via ESPN · 21+
Spread
ATL -1.5
Total
8.0
Defensive · -0.5 vs avg
0.5pt· 6.3h
Moneyline
4· 6.3h
Implied probabilities back-computed from American odds — break-even win % a moneyline bet needs to be +EV.
Line movement · 200 snapshots
ESPN-tracked · 21+
Spread
1.5
0.0 since open
Total
8.0
+0.5 since open
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 24pp · Top 8th Inning
C. Tromp
CBatter of the gamePerfect day
1-for-1 · 2.000 OPS
M. Perez
SPStarting pitcher10-K game
5.0 IP · 10 K · 4 ER · 5 H · 2 BB
L. Hicks
CBatter of the gamePerfect day
1-for-1 · 2.000 OPS
B. Garrett
SPStarting pitcher
3.0 IP · 2 K · 2 ER · 3 H · 3 BB
How it ended
ATL beat MIA 8-4. Dub's play in the top 8th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (24pp).
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
MIA vs ATL
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactStowers · doubled to right, Ruiz scored and Lopez scored.
Harris II · homered to center (421 feet).
Dub · ón reached on infield single to first, Yastrzemski scored, Acuña Jr. to second, Kim to third.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATL | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 8 |
| MIA | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Period scoring
ATL won 4 · MIA won 2
Inn 1
Albies 1
Stowers 2
Inn 2
Inn 3
Ruiz 1
Inn 4
Inn 5
Olson 1
Inn 6
II 1
Inn 7
Inn 8
Olson 2
Inn 9
Kim 1
Play-by-play · 658 plays
End of the 9th inning
ATL 8·MIA 4
· ·
ATL 8·MIA 4
Marsee struck out swinging.
· ·
ATL 8·MIA 4
−0.5pp
Pitch 4 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
ATL 8·MIA 4
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
ATL 8·MIA 4
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Bunted Foul
· ·
ATL 8·MIA 4
Hicks to second on fielder's indifference.
·
ATL 8·MIA 4
Hicks to second on fielder's indifference.
·
ATL 8·MIA 4
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
ATL 8·MIA 4
Raisel Iglesias pitches to Jakob Marsee
· ·
ATL 8·MIA 4
Marsee hit for Morel
·
ATL 8·MIA 4
·
ATL 8·MIA 4
Hicks singled to right.
·
ATL 8·MIA 4
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
ATL 8·MIA 4
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
ATL 8·MIA 4
Raisel Iglesias pitches to Liam Hicks
·
ATL 8·MIA 4
Hicks hit for Hernández
·
ATL 8·MIA 4
·
ATL 8·MIA 4
Lopez grounded out to shortstop.
·
ATL 8·MIA 4
−0.5pp
Pitch 5 : Ball In Play
·
ATL 8·MIA 4
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Looking
·
ATL 8·MIA 4
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
·
ATL 8·MIA 4
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
ATL 8·MIA 4
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
ATL 8·MIA 4
Raisel Iglesias pitches to Otto Lopez
·
ATL 8·MIA 4
·
ATL 8·MIA 4
Edwards flied out to left.
·
ATL 8·MIA 4
−1pp
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
ATL 8·MIA 4
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
ATL 8·MIA 4
Raisel Iglesias pitches to Xavier Edwards
·
ATL 8·MIA 4
Team stats
ATL
Away
Stat
MIA
Home
8
Runs
4
10
Hits
8
1
Errors
0
16
TB
13
1
HR
1
8
BB
4
11
K
13
21
LOB
18
Betting line
ATL -1.5·O/U 8·ATL -143/MIA +118
The receipts
+3.10
CLV pp · steam
Open price
-126
Close price
-143
Open no-vig
53.2%
Close no-vig
56.3%
Market steamed in our direction · Graded: hit
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
3 of 13 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
128
projections · 79 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
38.4%
ensemble · ATL favored
Elo Static
37.7%
P(MIA win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
33.2%
P(MIA win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
37.2%
P(MIA win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
2.01 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
87% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.