
CHC
88-66

CIN
78-76
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
CIN wins
CHC 4 · CIN 7 (by 3)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked CHC +3pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHC | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| CIN | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Recap · MLB
incinnati Reds held off Chicago Cubs, 7–4.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
CHC · top performer

Matt Shaw
RF
4-2
AB-H
1
R
2
RBI
CIN · top performer

Spencer Steer
LF
3-2
AB-H
2
R
3
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


CHC
88-66
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.278 | ||||||||
| 2-5 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.662 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT27.867 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT29.294 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.992 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 11-35 | 35 | 4 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 10 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 5.0 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | |
| 1.0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |
| 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
CIN
78-76
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT26.838 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT26.530 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2-3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.483 | ||||||||
| 1-2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |
SPRINT2872 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT28.586 | ||||||||
| Team | 7-29 | 29 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 4.2 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 2 | |
| 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 11 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 10 | 2 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantCHC
CIN
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
11
Hits
7
4
Runs
7
1
Errors
0
Current series
CIN wins series 5-2
Season series
CIN leads series 6-5
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 27pp · Bottom 6th Inning
M. Shaw
RFBatter of the game
2-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.750 OPS
S. Imanaga
SPStarting pitcher
5.0 IP · 4 K · 3 ER · 4 H · 2 BB
S. Steer
LFBatter of the game2-HR game
2-for-3 · 2 HR · 3.417 OPS
N. Lodolo
SPStarting pitcher
4.2 IP · 7 K · 4 ER · 9 H · 2 BB
How it ended
CIN beat CHC 7-4. Steer's play in the bottom 6th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (27pp).
Win probability
CIN vs CHC
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactShaw · homered to left (391 feet), Crow-Armstrong scored.
Friedl · singled to left, Hayes scored.
Steer · homered to left center (389 feet), Hays scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHC | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| CIN | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | — | 7 |
Period scoring
CHC won 2 · CIN won 3
Inn 1
Andujar 1
Inn 2
Swanson 1
Inn 3
Happ 1
McLain 1
Inn 4
Shaw 2
Steer 1
Inn 5
Friedl 1
Inn 6
Steer 2
Inn 7
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 571 plays
· ·
CHC 4·CIN 7
Happ flied out to left.
· ·
CHC 4·CIN 7
+1pp
Pitch 6 : Ball In Play
· ·
CHC 4·CIN 7
Pitch 5 : Ball 2
· ·
CHC 4·CIN 7
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
CHC 4·CIN 7
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Swinging
· ·
CHC 4·CIN 7
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
CHC 4·CIN 7
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
CHC 4·CIN 7
Emilio Pagan pitches to Ian Happ
· ·
CHC 4·CIN 7
· ·
CHC 4·CIN 7
Hoerner lined out to third.
· ·
CHC 4·CIN 7
+3pp
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
· ·
CHC 4·CIN 7
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
CHC 4·CIN 7
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
CHC 4·CIN 7
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
CHC 4·CIN 7
Emilio Pagan pitches to Nico Hoerner
· ·
CHC 4·CIN 7
·
CHC 4·CIN 7
Shaw doubled to right.
·
CHC 4·CIN 7
−3pp
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
·
CHC 4·CIN 7
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CHC 4·CIN 7
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Foul
·
CHC 4·CIN 7
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
CHC 4·CIN 7
Emilio Pagan pitches to Matt Shaw
·
CHC 4·CIN 7
·
CHC 4·CIN 7
Crow-Armstrong grounded out to first.
·
CHC 4·CIN 7
+0.9pp
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
·
CHC 4·CIN 7
Pitch 3 : Strike 1 Swinging
·
CHC 4·CIN 7
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
·
CHC 4·CIN 7
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
CHC 4·CIN 7
Emilio Pagan pitches to Pete Crow-Armstrong
·
CHC 4·CIN 7
Team stats
CHC
Away
Stat
CIN
Home
4
Runs
7
11
Hits
7
1
Errors
0
19
TB
22
2
HR
5
3
BB
5
10
K
6
12
LOB
8
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
4 of 14 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
123
projections · 78 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
39.7%
ensemble · CHC favored
Elo Static
46.9%
P(CIN win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
47.4%
P(CIN win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
48.1%
P(CIN win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.49 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
97% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.