
MIL
89-55

PIT
64-80
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
MIL wins
MIL 10 · PIT 2 (by 8)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked MIL +10pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIL | 4 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| PIT | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Recap · MLB
ilwaukee Brewers went into Pittsburgh Pirates and beat them, 10–2. It was a wire-to-wire rout.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
MIL · top performer

Andrew Vaughn
1B
5-4
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
PIT · top performer

Cam Devanney
SS
1-1
AB-H
0
R
1
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


MIL
89-55
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 2-3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.586 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT2744 | ||||||||
| 4-5 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.586 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT26.838 | ||||||||
| 1-5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| Team | 14-38 | 38 | 10 | 14 | 8 | 0 | 7 | 9 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 7.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 12 | 0 |
PIT
64-80
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT24.85 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.969 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.662 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1-1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 5-31 | 31 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 12 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 2.2 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 0 | |
| 1.1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 14 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 9 | 0 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantMIL
PIT
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
14
Hits
5
10
Runs
2
0
Errors
0
Current series
MIL wins series 5-2
Season series
MIL wins series 10-3
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 11pp · Top 1st Inning
A. Vaughn
1BBatter of the game
4-for-5 · 1 R · 1.600 OPS
J. Misiorowski
SPStarting pitcherQuality start
7.0 IP · 8 K · 1 ER · 3 H · 2 BB
C. Devanney
SSBatter of the gamePerfect day
1-for-1 · 2.000 OPS
B. Chandler
SPStarting pitcher
2.2 IP · 3 K · 9 ER · 9 H · 3 BB
How it ended
MIL beat PIT 10-2.
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
PIT vs MIL
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactBauers · doubled to right, Turang scored and Collins scored, Contreras to third.
Jansen · doubled to right.
Turang · singled to right, Perkins scored and Ortiz scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIL | 4 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| PIT | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Period scoring
MIL won 3 · PIT won 1
Inn 1
Bauers 2
Inn 2
Collins 1
Peguero 1
Inn 3
Turang 2
Inn 4
Inn 5
Inn 6
Inn 7
Jansen 1
Inn 8
Devanney 1
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 618 plays
End of the 9th inning
MIL 10·PIT 2
·
MIL 10·PIT 2
Bart grounded out to shortstop.
·
MIL 10·PIT 2
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
MIL 10·PIT 2
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
MIL 10·PIT 2
Craig Yoho pitches to Joey Bart
·
MIL 10·PIT 2
·
MIL 10·PIT 2
Cruz struck out swinging.
·
MIL 10·PIT 2
Pitch 3 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
MIL 10·PIT 2
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
MIL 10·PIT 2
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
MIL 10·PIT 2
Craig Yoho pitches to Oneil Cruz
·
MIL 10·PIT 2
·
MIL 10·PIT 2
Davis struck out swinging.
·
MIL 10·PIT 2
Pitch 5 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
MIL 10·PIT 2
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
·
MIL 10·PIT 2
Pitch 3 : Ball 1
·
MIL 10·PIT 2
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
·
MIL 10·PIT 2
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
·
MIL 10·PIT 2
Craig Yoho pitches to Henry Davis
·
MIL 10·PIT 2
Yoho relieved Payamps
·
MIL 10·PIT 2
Davis hit for McCutchen
·
MIL 10·PIT 2
Bottom of the 9th inning
MIL 10·PIT 2
Middle of the 9th inning
MIL 10·PIT 2
· ·
MIL 10·PIT 2
Ortiz grounded out to second.
· ·
MIL 10·PIT 2
Pitch 5 : Ball In Play
· ·
MIL 10·PIT 2
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
MIL 10·PIT 2
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
MIL 10·PIT 2
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
MIL 10·PIT 2
Team stats
MIL
Away
Stat
PIT
Home
10
Runs
2
14
Hits
5
0
Errors
0
18
TB
7
0
HR
0
7
BB
3
9
K
12
28
LOB
12
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
5 of 13 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
126
projections · 86 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
39.3%
ensemble · MIL favored
Elo Static
39.7%
P(PIT win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
40.1%
P(PIT win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
40.2%
P(PIT win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.22 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
99% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.