
CHW
54-88

DET
81-61
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
CHW wins
CHW 7 · DET 5 (by 2)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked DET +13pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| DET | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
hicago White Sox went into Detroit Tigers and beat them, 7–5.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
CHW · top performer

Colson Montgomery
SS
4-2
AB-H
2
R
4
RBI
DET · top performer

Parker Meadows
CF
1-1
AB-H
1
R
2
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


CHW
54-88
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT26.838 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT26.326 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT26.632 | ||||||||
| 1-2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 11-35 | 35 | 7 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 5.0 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 1 | |
| 1.2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 11 | 1 |
DET
81-61
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-5 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT26.123 | ||||||||
| 1-2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.969 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT26.941 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.381 | ||||||||
| 1-2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.278 | ||||||||
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 7-33 | 33 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 11 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 4.1 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3.1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |
| 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 11 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 2 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantCHW
DET
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
11
Hits
7
7
Runs
5
0
Errors
1
Current series
DET wins series 4-2
Season series
DET leads series 7-4
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 27pp · Top 7th Inning
C. Montgomery
SSBatter of the game
2-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.850 OPS
S. Smith
SPStarting pitcher
5.0 IP · 6 K · 4 ER · 3 H · 2 BB
P. Meadows
CFBatter of the gamePerfect day
1-for-1 · 1 HR · 5.000 OPS
J. Flaherty
SPStarting pitcher
4.1 IP · 2 K · 4 ER · 6 H · 2 BB
How it ended
CHW beat DET 7-5. Montgomery's play in the top 7th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (27pp).
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
DET vs CHW
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactMeadows · homered to right (385 feet), Dingler scored.
Dingler · struck out swinging.
Montgomery · homered to right (379 feet), Mead scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHW | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| DET | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
Period scoring
CHW won 4 · DET won 3
Inn 1
Montgomery 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Teel 1
Meadows 2
Inn 4
Robertson 1
Dingler 2
Inn 5
Montgomery 1
Inn 6
Benintendi 1
Inn 7
Montgomery 2
Inn 8
Torkelson 1
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 630 plays
End of the 9th inning
CHW 7·DET 5
·
CHW 7·DET 5
Torres flied out to left.
·
CHW 7·DET 5
−2pp
Pitch 9 : Ball In Play
·
CHW 7·DET 5
Pitch 8 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CHW 7·DET 5
Pitch 7 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CHW 7·DET 5
Pitch 6 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CHW 7·DET 5
Pitch 5 : Ball 3
·
CHW 7·DET 5
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
·
CHW 7·DET 5
Pitch 3 : Ball 1
·
CHW 7·DET 5
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Looking
·
CHW 7·DET 5
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CHW 7·DET 5
Jordan Leasure pitches to Gleyber Torres
·
CHW 7·DET 5
·
CHW 7·DET 5
Keith struck out swinging.
·
CHW 7·DET 5
−4pp
Pitch 5 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
CHW 7·DET 5
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Looking
·
CHW 7·DET 5
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
·
CHW 7·DET 5
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
CHW 7·DET 5
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CHW 7·DET 5
Jordan Leasure pitches to Colt Keith
·
CHW 7·DET 5
·
CHW 7·DET 5
Sweeney flied out to left.
·
CHW 7·DET 5
−5pp
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
CHW 7·DET 5
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
CHW 7·DET 5
Jordan Leasure pitches to Trey Sweeney
·
CHW 7·DET 5
Lee as designated hitter.
CHW 7·DET 5
Bottom of the 9th inning
CHW 7·DET 5
Middle of the 9th inning
CHW 7·DET 5
· ·
CHW 7·DET 5
Team stats
CHW
Away
Stat
DET
Home
7
Runs
5
11
Hits
7
0
Errors
1
20
TB
13
2
HR
1
3
BB
4
5
K
11
15
LOB
11
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
2 of 13 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
120
projections · 75 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
63.9%
ensemble · DET favored
Elo Static
63.0%
P(DET win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
62.0%
P(DET win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
61.7%
P(DET win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.56 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
96% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs