
TOR
74-54

PIT
54-74
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
PIT wins
TOR 1 · PIT 2 (by 1)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked TOR +9pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOR | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| PIT | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Recap · MLB
ittsburgh Pirates held off Toronto Blue Jays, 2–1. It came down to the final possession.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
TOR · top performer

George Springer
DH
3-1
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
PIT · top performer

Bryan Reynolds
LF
2-1
AB-H
1
R
0
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


TOR
74-54
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.920 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT25.716 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT26.838 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 3-29 | 29 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 5.2 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 0 | |
| 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 12 | 0 |
PIT
54-74
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT28.586 | ||||||||
| 1-2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.969 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT24.85 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 8-30 | 30 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 12 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 5.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | |
| 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 1 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantTOR
PIT
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
3
Hits
8
1
Runs
2
0
Errors
0
Current series
PIT wins series 2-1
Season series
PIT wins series 2-1
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 18pp · Bottom 1st Inning
G. Springer
DHBatter of the game
1-for-3 · 1 HR · 1.833 OPS
C. Bassitt
SPStarting pitcher10-K game
5.2 IP · 10 K · 2 ER · 6 H · 2 BB
B. Reynolds
LFBatter of the game
1-for-2 · 1 R · 1.250 OPS
J. Oviedo
SPStarting pitcher
5.0 IP · 6 K · 1 ER · 2 H · 1 BB
How it ended
PIT beat TOR 2-1. Pham's play in the bottom 1st inning drove the biggest swing of the night (18pp).
Win probability
PIT vs TOR
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactPham · doubled to left, Horwitz scored and Reynolds scored.
Pham · struck out swinging.
N. Gonzales · grounded into double play, shortstop to second to first, Simon out at second.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOR | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| PIT | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 2 |
Period scoring
TOR won 0 · PIT won 1
Inn 1
Pham 2
Inn 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Inn 5
Inn 6
Inn 7
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 519 plays
·
TOR 1·PIT 2
Varsho flied out to center.
·
TOR 1·PIT 2
+4pp
Pitch 1 : Ball In Play
·
TOR 1·PIT 2
Dennis Santana pitches to Daulton Varsho
·
TOR 1·PIT 2
·
TOR 1·PIT 2
Kirk flied out to right.BIG MOMENT
·
TOR 1·PIT 2
+7pp
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
·
TOR 1·PIT 2
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
·
TOR 1·PIT 2
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Looking
·
TOR 1·PIT 2
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
·
TOR 1·PIT 2
Dennis Santana pitches to Alejandro Kirk
·
TOR 1·PIT 2
·
TOR 1·PIT 2
Bichette struck out looking.BIG MOMENT
·
TOR 1·PIT 2
+5pp
Pitch 3 : Strike 3 Looking
·
TOR 1·PIT 2
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Looking
·
TOR 1·PIT 2
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
TOR 1·PIT 2
Dennis Santana pitches to Bo Bichette
·
TOR 1·PIT 2
Santana relieved Mattson
·
TOR 1·PIT 2
Top of the 9th inning
TOR 1·PIT 2
End of the 8th inning
TOR 1·PIT 2
·
TOR 1·PIT 2
Davis grounded into double play, shortstop to second to first, Triolo out at second.
· ·
TOR 1·PIT 2
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
· ·
TOR 1·PIT 2
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
TOR 1·PIT 2
Seranthony Dominguez pitches to Henry Davis
· ·
TOR 1·PIT 2
·
TOR 1·PIT 2
Triolo walked.
·
TOR 1·PIT 2
+2pp
Pitch 6 : Ball 4
·
TOR 1·PIT 2
Pitch 5 : Ball 3
·
TOR 1·PIT 2
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
·
TOR 1·PIT 2
Team stats
TOR
Away
Stat
PIT
Home
1
Runs
2
3
Hits
8
0
Errors
0
7
TB
10
1
HR
0
1
BB
4
8
K
12
8
LOB
13
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
2 of 10 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
123
projections · 86 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
39.4%
ensemble · TOR favored
Elo Static
40.8%
P(PIT win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
41.2%
P(PIT win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
41.3%
P(PIT win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.22 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
99% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.