
CHC
68-52

TOR
71-51
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
TOR wins
CHC 1 · TOR 2 (by 1)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked TOR +5pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| TOR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Recap · MLB
oronto Blue Jays held off Chicago Cubs, 2–1. It came down to the final possession.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
CHC · top performer

Michael Busch
1B
3-1
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
TOR · top performer

Vladimir Guerrero Jr.
1B
3-1
AB-H
1
R
2
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


CHC
68-52
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.716 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.662 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.278 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT27.867 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.992 | ||||||||
| Team | 6-33 | 33 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 9 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 7.0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 1 |
TOR
71-51
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT26.838 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT26.123 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT25.513 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 3-24 | 24 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 7.0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 1 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantCHC
TOR
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
6
Hits
3
1
Runs
2
0
Errors
0
Current series
TOR wins series 2-1
Season series
TOR wins series 2-1
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 34pp · Bottom 7th Inning
M. Busch
1BBatter of the game
1-for-3 · 1 HR · 1.667 OPS
M. Boyd
SPStarting pitcher
7.0 IP · 5 K · 2 ER · 2 H · 1 BB
V. Guerrero Jr.
1BBatter of the game
1-for-3 · 1 HR · 1.667 OPS
M. Scherzer
SPStarting pitcherQuality start
7.0 IP · 3 K · 1 ER · 5 H · 1 BB
How it ended
TOR beat CHC 2-1. Guerrero Jr.'s play in the bottom 7th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (34pp).
Win probability
TOR vs CHC
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactBusch · homered to right center (409 feet).
Guerrero Jr. · homered to center (402 feet), Schneider scored.
Tucker · struck out swinging.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| TOR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | — | 2 |
Period scoring
CHC won 1 · TOR won 1
Inn 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Inn 5
Inn 6
Busch 1
Inn 7
Jr. 2
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 442 plays
· ·
CHC 1·TOR 2
Swanson struck out swinging.BIG MOMENT
· ·
CHC 1·TOR 2
+7pp
Pitch 5 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
CHC 1·TOR 2
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
CHC 1·TOR 2
Pitch 3 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
CHC 1·TOR 2
Hoerner stole second.
·
CHC 1·TOR 2
Hoerner stole second.
·
CHC 1·TOR 2
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
· ·
CHC 1·TOR 2
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
CHC 1·TOR 2
Jeff Hoffman pitches to Dansby Swanson
· ·
CHC 1·TOR 2
· ·
CHC 1·TOR 2
Castro struck out swinging.BIG MOMENT
· ·
CHC 1·TOR 2
+10pp
Pitch 3 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
CHC 1·TOR 2
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
CHC 1·TOR 2
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
CHC 1·TOR 2
Jeff Hoffman pitches to Willi Castro
· ·
CHC 1·TOR 2
·
CHC 1·TOR 2
Hoerner singled to center.BIG MOMENT
·
CHC 1·TOR 2
−7pp
Pitch 1 : Ball In Play
·
CHC 1·TOR 2
Jeff Hoffman pitches to Nico Hoerner
·
CHC 1·TOR 2
·
CHC 1·TOR 2
Caissie struck out swinging.BIG MOMENT
·
CHC 1·TOR 2
+8pp
Pitch 3 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
CHC 1·TOR 2
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
CHC 1·TOR 2
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
·
CHC 1·TOR 2
Jeff Hoffman pitches to Owen Caissie
·
CHC 1·TOR 2
Hoffman relieved Domínguez
·
CHC 1·TOR 2
Lukes in right field.
CHC 1·TOR 2
Straw in left field.
CHC 1·TOR 2
Varsho in center field.
CHC 1·TOR 2
Team stats
CHC
Away
Stat
TOR
Home
1
Runs
2
6
Hits
3
0
Errors
0
12
TB
6
1
HR
1
2
BB
1
9
K
6
15
LOB
3
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
2 of 14 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
123
projections · 85 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
53.3%
ensemble · TOR favored
Elo Static
54.9%
P(TOR win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
52.5%
P(TOR win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
55.1%
P(TOR win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
1.18 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
92% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.