
PHI
61-47

CHW
40-69
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
CHW wins
PHI 3 · CHW 9 (by 6)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked PHI +9pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| CHW | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Recap · MLB
hicago White Sox held off Philadelphia Phillies, 9–3. It was a wire-to-wire rout.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
PHI · top performer

Brandon Marsh
LF
4-2
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
CHW · top performer

Lenyn Sosa
2B
2-2
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


PHI
61-47
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT2744 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT27.148 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.175 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT28.688 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 8-35 | 35 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 5.0 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0.1 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0.2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 17 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
CHW
40-69
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 3-5 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.381 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3-4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT26.326 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT24.12 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2-2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 17-39 | 39 | 9 | 17 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 3.1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | |
| 4.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 1 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantPHI
CHW
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
8
Hits
17
3
Runs
9
0
Errors
1
Current series
CHW win series 2-1
Season series
CHW win series 2-1
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 18pp · Bottom 7th Inning
B. Marsh
LFBatter of the game
2-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.750 OPS
T. Walker
SPStarting pitcher
5.0 IP · 2 ER · 7 H
L. Sosa
2BBatter of the gamePerfect day
2-for-2 · 1 R · 2.000 OPS
M. Vasil
RPTop reliever
4.0 IP · 3 K · 0 ER · 3 H
How it ended
CHW beat PHI 9-3. Sosa's play in the bottom 7th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (18pp).
Win probability
CHW vs PHI
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactKemp · singled to center, Castellanos scored, Marsh to second.
Montgomery · homered to left center (379 feet).
Sosa · singled to right, Tauchman scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| CHW | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | — | 9 |
Period scoring
PHI won 1 · CHW won 2
Inn 1
Inn 2
Teel 1
Inn 3
Inn 4
Castellanos 1
Montgomery 1
Inn 5
Inn 6
Inn 7
Vargas 3
Inn 8
Inn 9
Marsh 1
Play-by-play · 555 plays
· ·
PHI 3·CHW 9
Marchán fouled out to third.
· ·
PHI 3·CHW 9
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
· ·
PHI 3·CHW 9
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
PHI 3·CHW 9
Steven Wilson pitches to Rafael Marchan
· ·
PHI 3·CHW 9
· ·
PHI 3·CHW 9
Rojas safe at first on throwing error by third baseman Rojas, Stott to second.
· ·
PHI 3·CHW 9
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
· ·
PHI 3·CHW 9
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
PHI 3·CHW 9
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
PHI 3·CHW 9
Steven Wilson pitches to Johan Rojas
· ·
PHI 3·CHW 9
·
PHI 3·CHW 9
Stott singled to right.
·
PHI 3·CHW 9
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
·
PHI 3·CHW 9
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
PHI 3·CHW 9
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
PHI 3·CHW 9
Steven Wilson pitches to Bryson Stott
· ·
PHI 3·CHW 9
·
PHI 3·CHW 9
Kemp struck out swinging.
·
PHI 3·CHW 9
Pitch 4 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
PHI 3·CHW 9
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
·
PHI 3·CHW 9
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
PHI 3·CHW 9
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
·
PHI 3·CHW 9
Steven Wilson pitches to Otto Kemp
· ·
PHI 3·CHW 9
·
PHI 3·CHW 9
Marsh homered to right (371 feet).
·
PHI 3·CHW 9
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
·
PHI 3·CHW 9
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Foul
·
PHI 2·CHW 9
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
PHI 2·CHW 9
Steven Wilson pitches to Brandon Marsh
· ·
PHI 3·CHW 9
Team stats
PHI
Away
Stat
CHW
Home
3
Runs
9
8
Hits
17
0
Errors
1
12
TB
31
1
HR
4
1
BB
0
8
K
2
12
LOB
16
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
5 of 12 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
118
projections · 78 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
39.4%
ensemble · PHI favored
Elo Static
41.3%
P(CHW win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
40.3%
P(CHW win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
42.2%
P(CHW win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.78 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
95% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.