Free during beta —to track favorites + alerts

THE ONE · FANTASY

Receivers,
graded

How our weekly xFP projections for receivers actually scored — averaged across the season, ranked against a season-average baseline. Receipts, not picks.

2025 receivers, gradedproj → actual · Δ /game

  1. 1Ja'Marr ChaseCIN · 16w15.119.6+4.5
  2. 2Drake LondonATL · 12w14.916.8+1.9
  3. 3Puka NacuaLA · 16w14.623.4+8.8
  4. 4Rashee RiceKC · 8w14.518.8+4.2
  5. 5Amon-Ra St. BrownDET · 17w14.419.1+4.6
  6. 6Davante AdamsLA · 14w14.015.9+1.9
  7. 7CeeDee LambDAL · 13w13.715.5+1.8
  8. 8Jaxon Smith-NjigbaSEA · 17w13.621.2+7.6
  9. 9Mike EvansTB · 8w12.810.62.2
  10. 10Nico CollinsHOU · 15w12.315.1+2.7
  11. 11George PickensDAL · 17w12.217.2+5.0
  12. 12Justin JeffersonMIN · 17w12.111.90.2
  13. 13Ladd McConkeyLAC · 16w11.511.30.2
  14. 14Chris OlaveNO · 16w11.316.7+5.5
  15. 15Wan'Dale RobinsonNYG · 16w11.213.6+2.4
  16. 16A.J. BrownPHI · 15w11.114.7+3.6
  17. 17Brian Thomas Jr.JAX · 14w11.19.91.2
  18. 18Courtland SuttonDEN · 17w10.912.9+2.0
  19. 19Garrett WilsonNYJ · 7w10.914.2+3.4
  20. 20Rome OdunzeCHI · 12w10.912.2+1.3
  21. 21Quentin JohnstonLAC · 13w10.813.2+2.3
  22. 22Jakobi MeyersJAX · 16w10.611.0+0.4
  23. 23Marvin Harrison Jr.ARI · 12w10.610.7+0.0
  24. 24Michael PittmanIND · 17w10.411.9+1.5
  25. 25Emeka EgbukaTB · 17w10.411.5+1.1
  26. 26Tee HigginsCIN · 15w10.314.1+3.8
  27. 27Jameson WilliamsDET · 17w10.212.9+2.7
  28. 28Michael WilsonARI · 17w10.213.0+2.7
  29. 29DK MetcalfPIT · 14w10.012.9+2.9
  30. 30Jauan JenningsSF · 15w10.011.6+1.6
  31. 31Jaylen WaddleMIA · 16w10.012.1+2.1
  32. 32DeVonta SmithPHI · 17w10.011.9+1.9
  33. 33Jordan AddisonMIN · 14w9.99.70.3
  34. 34DJ MooreCHI · 17w9.810.1+0.4
  35. 35Terry McLaurinWAS · 10w9.811.4+1.7
  36. 36Ricky PearsallSF · 9w9.89.8+0.0
  37. 37Keenan AllenLAC · 17w9.710.7+1.0
  38. 38Zay FlowersBAL · 17w9.714.3+4.6
  39. 39Tetairoa McMillanCAR · 17w9.712.6+2.9
  40. 40Xavier WorthyKC · 14w9.67.91.8

Average PPR points per graded week (2025, weeks 118). A week counts only when the player was both projected and active. Receipts of how the model did — not picks.