
ESPN
Lead playmaker
Scoring
89
Playmaking
100
Defense
31
Shooting
84
Combine
Max vertical
36.0"p42
Lane agility
10.78sp79
¾ sprint
3.07sp83
Standing reach
96.0"p9
Draft outlook
Projected landing
Outside the top 60
THE ONE has them at #63, below the two-round projection window.
Model vs the field
The One
#63
Field
#70
In line with the field — our board and the consensus agree within a couple of slots.
across 2 mock boards
Scouting summary
Lead playmaker profile. The loudest scout signal: elite bpm (BPM = 99th pct). Their NCAA dominance composite lands at 87 on a 100 scale. Mock consensus pegs them 70th across 2 boards.
Auto-generated from archetype + top deterministic chip · long-form narrative ships when the generator's AI pass is enabled.
Mock consensus over time
Draft score breakdown
avg rank 70 across 2 boards
Deterministic signals · v1 rules
Elite BPM
BPM = 99th pct
High usage + efficient
USG and TS percentiles both clear the v1 trigger
Short wingspan for position
wingspan = 4th pct
Elite playmaker (G)
AST% = 100th pct
Consensus risers
latest consensus improved by 7 spots
Older for class
age 25.2 at draft; class median 21.9
Trait grades
Combine radar · vs. G-bucket
Wingspan
med 79.8"
74.5"
p4
Standing reach
med 100.0"
96.0"
p9
Max vertical
med 36.5"
36.0"
p42
Standing vert
med 30.0"
30.5"
p53
¾ sprint
med 3.19s
3.07s
p83
Lane agility
med 11.00s
10.78s
p79
Shuttle
med 3.06s
3.06s
p50
College stats · 2025-26 season
35 games · 79% min
labeled Scoring PG
Efficiency
Playmaking
Defense
Rebounding
Composite
via BartTorvik · percentiles vs G-bucket of the 2025-26 D1 pool
X-factor · Risk · Scheme fit
Long-form scouting prose ships when the generator's AI narrative pass is enabled. The deterministic chip list above carries the same information as structured signals.
Generated by deterministic-v3-ageadj-consensus · May 30, 2026