Free during beta —Free during beta — to track favorite players + get game alertsto track favorites + alerts

ESPN

SG#6 of 32 wings in 2026· Projected R1

Isaiah Evans

Two-way wing

Duke·6'6" · 186lb·6'9" wing·8'9" reach·8.5" hand·20.5 yo at draft

1st-round non-lottery

ATH composite

NCAA dominance

Scoring

Playmaking

Defense

Shooting

Combine

Max vertical

35.5"p52

Lane agility

11.87sp14

¾ sprint

3.18sp72

Standing reach

104.5"p49

Data completeness

grade A · 100/100

7/7 combine drills · D1 stats matched (6/6) · 3 mock boards · birthdate known

measures the data backing this profile — not confidence in the ranking

Skill signature · earned from the data

percentile vs the 2026 class · at position

LockdownSynergy defense 99thRim ProtectorBLK 80th · classFloor Spacer65% 3PT rate · 55% eFGTwo-WaySynergy two-way 63/100

The read · from the percentiles

auto-derived · 2026 class

Two-way wing. Carried by perimeter defense (99th) and rim protection (80th); the question marks are rebounding (3rd) and passing (10th).

StrengthsPerimeter defense99Rim protection80

WatchRebounding3Passing10

Why this rank

Editorial pin

Our scouting call slots Evans at #21 — the deterministic model alone had Evans at #31.

Draft outlook

Where the math lands them

Projected landing

#21

Detroit Pistons

1st round

Model vs the field

The One

#21

Field

#23

In line with the field — our board and the consensus agree within a couple of slots.

across 3 mock boards

Scouting summary

Two-way wing profile. The loudest scout signal: elite bpm (BPM = 97th pct). Their NCAA dominance composite lands at 75 on a 100 scale. Mock consensus pegs them 23rd across 3 boards.

Auto-generated from archetype + top deterministic chip · long-form narrative ships when the generator's AI pass is enabled.

Our board over time

Where we've had him since May 30

now#21▲ Riser · up 29

May 30 · #50Jul 27 · #21

How the score is built

deterministic · auditable

69.3draft scoreboard #21

Market 62% · consensus 23rd / 3 boardsModel 38% · ranked 46th

Our blend weights the mock-consensus board 62% and our deterministic, age-adjusted model 38% — the market had Evans 23rd, our model 46th. The model's own dominance / production / athletic split is in the card above.

Draft score breakdown

How the 69-point composite stacks up

chip delta · +9

Athletic compositeweight 40%38

NCAA dominanceweight 40%75

Mock consensusweight 20%77

avg rank 23 across 3 boards

Deterministic signals · v1 rules

Elite BPM
BPM = 97th pct
+6
High usage + efficient
USG and TS percentiles both clear the v1 trigger
+5
Short wingspan for position
wingspan = 16th pct
-4
Young for class
age 20.5 at draft; class median 22.4
+2

Skill radar · the shape of his game

percentile vs the 2026 class · at position

Avg axis 46th · each vertex is a positional percentile in the 2026 class.

Combine radar · vs. W-bucket

7 of 7 drills measured

cohort n=326 · 2000–2025

Wingspan
med 83.0"
80.8"
p15
Standing reach
med 104.5"
104.5"
p49
Max vertical
med 35.0"
35.5"
p52
Standing vert
med 29.5"
27.0"
p17
¾ sprint
med 3.25s
3.18s
p72
Lane agility
med 11.29s
11.87s
p14
Shuttle
med 3.04s
2.89s
p85

Frame & hands · the tape

percentile vs the 2026 class · at position

Height

6'5.5"28

Wingspan diff

+3.3"22

Hand length

8.50"11

Hand width

9.00"6

Wingspan differential = wingspan − barefoot height (the “ape index”); a positive number means longer than tall. Combine measurements, percentile vs the 2026 class at the position.

Combine drills · controlled setting

percentile vs the 2026 class · at position

Shooting & agility at the combine

Spot-up 3PT

14/25 · 56%20

Off-dribble 3PT

21/30 · 70%33

On-move 3PT

17/25 · 68%73

Modified agility

2.89s65

via stats.nba.com draft combine · shooting at the college 3PT distance (makes / attempts)

Two-way profile · how they play

Synergy · per possession · Duke Blue Devils

63 / 100 two-way score

Offense

1.12 PPP57

Defense

0.72 allow99

Shot dieteFG 55%3PT rate 65%FT rate 3%

Evans's offensive + defensive efficiency vs the 2026 class, per Synergy possessions.

NBA comps · measurables + production

vs wings · 2011–2025

Closest NBA comparisons

Matched on combine measurements (length, frame, explosion, agility) and college production (BPM, TS%, usage, assists), within position group. Each comp's tag shows which basis drove it; the college production + career outcome shown belongs to the comp, never projected onto Evans.

“Top X%” = closer to Evans than (100−X)% of all drafted wings on the measurables + production; the bar shows relative closeness among these 5.

1Tyler Honeycutt2011
top 1%
measurables + production · matched on 8 of 9 measurables · 5 of 4 production
Became: Fringe NBA · -0.1 career VORP · 24 g
College: UCLA '11 · TS 51.9 · BPM 6.5
Weight186 lbvs187 lbWing80.8"vs81.0"Ht6'6"vs6'7"Reach104.5"vs105.0"Agility11.87svs11.68sMax vert35.5"vs37.0"¾ sprint3.18svs3.07sStd vert27.0"vs30.0"BPM6.5vs6.5USG%21.8vs21.7PORPAG3.9vs2.1TS%59.0vs51.9AST%8.4vs16.8
2Johnny Furphy2024
top 1%
measurables + production · matched on 9 of 9 measurables · 6 of 4 production
Became: Too early to grade · -0.3 career VORP · 85 g
College: Kansas '24 · TS 61.4 · BPM 6.5
Reach104.5"vs104.5"Weight186 lbvs189 lbStd vert27.0"vs26.0"Wing80.8"vs80.0"Shuttle2.89svs3.00sHt6'6"vs6'8"Max vert35.5"vs32.0"¾ sprint3.18svs3.00sAgility11.87svs11.15sBPM6.5vs6.5AST%8.4vs7.1TS%59.0vs61.4Age20.5vs19.6PORPAG3.9vs2.6USG%21.8vs17.0
3Dylan Windler2019
top 2%
measurables + production · matched on 9 of 9 measurables · 6 of 4 production
Became: Rotation player · 0.2 career VORP · 101 g
College: Belmont '19 · TS 68.0 · BPM 8.9
Reach104.5"vs104.5"Ht6'6"vs6'6"Shuttle2.89svs2.94sMax vert35.5"vs37.5"Wing80.8"vs82.0"Std vert27.0"vs29.0"Weight186 lbvs196 lb¾ sprint3.18svs3.30sAgility11.87svs10.70sUSG%21.8vs24.7BPM6.5vs8.9AST%8.4vs13.4PORPAG3.9vs5.3Age20.5vs22.8TS%59.0vs68.0
4Will Riley2025
top 4%
measurables + production · matched on 9 of 9 measurables · 5 of 4 production
Became: Too early to grade · -1.0 career VORP · 74 g
College: Illinois '25 · TS 53.3 · BPM 4.6
Wing80.8"vs80.8"Weight186 lbvs186 lb¾ sprint3.18svs3.20sStd vert27.0"vs27.5"Reach104.5"vs104.0"Agility11.87svs11.70sMax vert35.5"vs32.0"Shuttle2.89svs3.10sHt6'6"vs6'8"USG%21.8vs23.0PORPAG3.9vs3.3BPM6.5vs4.6TS%59.0vs53.3AST%8.4vs16.0
5Jaylen Wells2024
top 4%
measurables + production · matched on 9 of 9 measurables · 6 of 4 production
Became: Too early to grade · -0.6 career VORP · 148 g
College: Washington St. '24 · TS 58.4 · BPM 5.2
Ht6'6"vs6'7"Max vert35.5"vs36.0"Std vert27.0"vs27.5"Reach104.5"vs103.5"Wing80.8"vs79.3"Shuttle2.89svs3.03s¾ sprint3.18svs3.08sAgility11.87svs11.28sWeight186 lbvs206 lbPORPAG3.9vs4.0AST%8.4vs7.9TS%59.0vs58.4Age20.5vs20.8BPM6.5vs5.2USG%21.8vs18.9

Per-axis gap● near (under ½ SD)● ~1 SD● far (over 1 SD)

Comp outcomes · real careers

8/10 reached the NBA

How the closest comps turned out

1 Star4 Rotation3 Fringe2 Never reached NBA

Median outcome: Fringe — the typical case among these comps, between the floor and ceiling.

Ceiling

Gordon Hayward2010

Star · 1× All-Star

Floor

Kenrich Williams2018

Never reached NBA

The 15 nearest blended comps (5 too recent to grade). These are the comps' own careers — a range of what the profile has become before, not a projection of Evans.

College teamDukeACC#3 T-Rank35-3SOS elite schedule · top 4%via BartTorvik

College stats · 2025-26 season

Duke· ACC

38 games · 71% min

labeled Wing G

Efficiency

TS%
59.0%85
eFG%
55.0%81
USG%
21.8%75
ORTG
122.495
AdjOE
132.798
RIM%
68.9%86

Playmaking

AST%
8.4%46
TO%
11.0%87

Defense

STL%
1.5%39
BLK%
2.9%91
DRTG
92.294
DBPM
+2.390

Rebounding

ORB%
1.7%14
DRB%
10.7%32

Composite

BPM
+6.597
OBPM
+4.296
PORPAG
3.997

via BartTorvik · percentiles vs W-bucket of all D1 history (2008-26)

Per-game production · 2025-26

percentile vs D1 2008-25 · at position

38 games· 28.2 mpg

Points

15.093

Rebounds

3.258

Assists

1.370

Steals

0.765

Blocks

0.794

ShootingFG 43.3%3PT 36.1%FT 86.0%

per-game · via barttorvik · percentiles vs all D1 2008-25 at the position

Raw per-game counts — not pace-adjusted; ranked against an 18-season D1 reference where elite-tier percentiles are stable across the window.

X-factor · Risk · Scheme fit

Long-form scouting prose ships when the generator's AI narrative pass is enabled. The deterministic chip list above carries the same information as structured signals.

Generated by deterministic-v3-ageadj-consensus · Jun 25, 2026

Get the 2027 big board the day it drops

Plus pick-by-pick grades on draft night — and we grade our own board against the actual draft, misses included. Free, double opt-in.