Darryn Peterson

Two-way wing. Carried by shot creation (90th); the question marks are passing (27th) and rebounding (30th).

Draft outlook

Where the math lands them

Projected landing

#2

Utah Jazz

1st round

Model vs the field

The One

#2

vs

Field

#2

In line with the field — our board and the consensus agree within a couple of slots.

across 3 mock boards

Scouting summary

Two-way wing profile. The loudest scout signal: elite bpm (BPM = 99th pct). Their NCAA dominance composite lands at 82 on a 100 scale. Mock consensus pegs them 2nd across 3 boards.

Auto-generated from archetype + top deterministic chip · long-form narrative ships when the generator's AI pass is enabled.

45 / 100 two-way score

Peterson's offensive + defensive efficiency vs the 2026 class, per Synergy possessions.

Closest NBA comparisons

Matched on combine measurements (length, frame, explosion, agility) and college production (BPM, TS%, usage, assists), within position group. Each comp's tag shows which basis drove it; the college production + career outcome shown belongs to the comp, never projected onto Peterson.

“Top X%” = closer to Peterson than (100−X)% of all drafted wings on the measurables + production; the bar shows relative closeness among these 5.

1. 1Glen Rice2013

   top 1%

   measurables + production · matched on 9 of 9 measurables · 5 of 4 production

   Became: Fringe NBA · -0.2 career VORP · 16 g

   College: Georgia Tech '12 · TS 53.9 · BPM 6.4

   Wing81.8"vs81.3"Agility11.17svs10.99sStd vert31.5"vs33.0"Reach103.0"vs101.5"¾ sprint3.16svs3.25sShuttle2.95svs3.08sHt6'5"vs6'5"Weight199 lbvs211 lbMax vert37.5"vs40.5"BPM7.8vs6.4TS%57.8vs53.9PORPAG4.7vs3.1AST%12.5vs19.1USG%30.9vs25.7
2. 2RJ Luis Jr.2025

   top 2%

   measurables + production · matched on 9 of 9 measurables · 5 of 4 production

   Became: Too early to grade · 0 g

   College: St. John's '25 · TS 52.5 · BPM 4.9

   Std vert31.5"vs31.5"Agility11.17svs11.20sMax vert37.5"vs38.0"Ht6'5"vs6'6"Reach103.0"vs103.5"Shuttle2.95svs3.00sWing81.8"vs82.5"¾ sprint3.16svs3.10sWeight199 lbvs210 lbAST%12.5vs12.3USG%30.9vs27.6BPM7.8vs4.9TS%57.8vs52.5Age19.4vs22.6
3. 3Glenn Robinson III2014

   top 4%

   measurables + production · matched on 9 of 9 measurables · 5 of 4 production

   Became: Rotation player · 0.4 career VORP · 304 g

   College: Michigan '14 · TS 56.6 · BPM 5.6

   Ht6'5"vs6'6"¾ sprint3.16svs3.15sAgility11.17svs11.22sWing81.8"vs82.0"Shuttle2.95svs3.04sWeight199 lbvs211 lbReach103.0"vs100.5"Max vert37.5"vs41.5"Std vert31.5"vs36.5"TS%57.8vs56.6BPM7.8vs5.6Age19.4vs20.5AST%12.5vs7.6USG%30.9vs21.2
4. 4Joe Wieskamp2021

   top 2%

   measurables + production · matched on 9 of 9 measurables · 6 of 4 production

   Became: Fringe NBA · -0.2 career VORP · 38 g

   College: Iowa '21 · TS 61.6 · BPM 7.7

   Reach103.0"vs103.0"Ht6'5"vs6'6"Weight199 lbvs205 lbStd vert31.5"vs30.0"Wing81.8"vs83.0"¾ sprint3.16svs3.04sAgility11.17svs10.70sShuttle2.95svs3.18sMax vert37.5"vs42.0"BPM7.8vs7.7PORPAG4.7vs4.2AST%12.5vs10.4TS%57.8vs61.6Age19.4vs21.8USG%30.9vs21.0
5. 5Kevin McCullar Jr.2024

   top 3%

   measurables + production · matched on 4 of 9 measurables · 5 of 4 production

   Became: Too early to grade · -0.1 career VORP · 25 g

   College: Kansas '24 · TS 56.4 · BPM 6.5

   Reach103.0"vs103.0"Ht6'5"vs6'5"Wing81.8"vs81.0"Weight199 lbvs206 lbTS%57.8vs56.4BPM7.8vs6.5USG%30.9vs27.1AST%12.5vs21.8Age19.4vs23.3

How the closest comps turned out

Median outcome: Fringe — the typical case among these comps, between the floor and ceiling.

The 15 nearest blended comps (2 too recent to grade). These are the comps' own careers — a range of what the profile has become before, not a projection of Peterson.

via BartTorvik · percentiles vs W-bucket of all D1 history (2008-26)

24 games· 29.0 mpg

per-game · via barttorvik · percentiles vs all D1 2008-25 at the position

Raw per-game counts — not pace-adjusted; ranked against an 18-season D1 reference where elite-tier percentiles are stable across the window.