
ESPN
Lead playmaker
Scoring
92
Playmaking
100
Defense
38
Shooting
89
Combine
Max vertical
36.5"p48
Lane agility
10.99sp58
¾ sprint
3.06sp84
Standing reach
98.5"p28
Rare
Rare outlier — top 5% draft score
Draft outlook
Projected landing

#6
Brooklyn Nets
1st roundModel vs the field
The One
#6
Field
#6
In line with the field — our board and the consensus agree within a couple of slots.
across 3 mock boards
Scouting summary
Lead playmaker profile. The loudest scout signal: elite bpm (BPM = 98th pct). Their NCAA dominance composite lands at 84 on a 100 scale. Mock consensus pegs them 6th across 3 boards.
Auto-generated from archetype + top deterministic chip · long-form narrative ships when the generator's AI pass is enabled.
Mock consensus over time
Draft score breakdown
avg rank 6 across 3 boards
Consensus floor applied: 90 (top-15 multi-source override)
Deterministic signals · v1 rules
Elite BPM
BPM = 98th pct
High usage + efficient
USG and TS percentiles both clear the v1 trigger
Elite playmaker (G)
AST% = 100th pct
Consensus top-15
average consensus rank 5.7
Young for class
age 19.6 at draft; class median 21.9
Trait grades
Combine radar · vs. G-bucket
Wingspan
med 79.8"
78.5"
p30
Standing reach
med 100.0"
98.5"
p28
Max vertical
med 36.5"
36.5"
p48
Standing vert
med 30.0"
31.5"
p69
¾ sprint
med 3.19s
3.06s
p84
Lane agility
med 11.00s
10.99s
p58
Shuttle
med 3.06s
2.93s
p81
College stats · 2025-26 season
36 games · 84% min
labeled Scoring PG
Efficiency
Playmaking
Defense
Rebounding
Composite
via BartTorvik · percentiles vs G-bucket of the 2025-26 D1 pool
X-factor · Risk · Scheme fit
Long-form scouting prose ships when the generator's AI narrative pass is enabled. The deterministic chip list above carries the same information as structured signals.
Generated by deterministic-v3-ageadj-consensus · May 30, 2026