Free during beta —to track favorites + alerts
FINAL+14CHI
WSH

WSH

13-16

6478
CHI

CHI

8-21

Historical comparables

Games like this · top 6 from 310 candidates

basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year

WNBATue, Aug 5FinalSeriesWSH wins series 3-1

Recap · WNBA

hicago Sky held off Washington Mystics, 78–64.

ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.

ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page

WNBA · Washington Mystics at Chicago Sky · final

WNBA · Box scoreTRACKING

Final
64
78
WSH13-16CHI8-21
WSH

WSH

13-16

64
CoreReboundsPlaymakingDefenseDiscipline
PlayerMINPTSREBASTSTLBLKTO+/-
241061111-19
26851502-16
32815103-15
341342402-10
32823101-12
13540111+5
112100010
22713100-5
Team64251614211
DNP: A. Clark, G. Amoore
CHI

CHI

8-21

78
CoreReboundsPlaymakingDefenseDiscipline
PlayerMINPTSREBASTSTLBLKTO+/-
201231001+14
3618102102+14
3116133002+10
26514122+18
241505202+11
13241101+4
14000001-2
17411003+3
19615103+1
Team7833226218
DNP: A. Reese, C. Vandersloot

Stat compare

Headline stats · full table below

42

FG %

54

16

Ast

22

Season series

WSH wins series 3-1

Jun 18WSHWSH79@CHICHI72
Jul 8CHICHI79@WSHWSH81
Jul 29CHICHI86@WSHWSH103
Aug 6WSHWSH64@CHICHI78today

Headlines · top performers

Game flowWSH CHI

Biggest swing: 7pp · 1st Quarter · 6:12

WSHWSH
S. Citron

S. Citron

G

Game leader · 34 min

13 PTS · 4 REB · 2 AST

CHICHI
E. Williams

E. Williams

C

Game leader · 36 min

18 PTS · 10 REB · 2 AST

How it ended

CHI beat WSH 78-64. E. Williams led with 18 PTS, 10 REB, 2 AST. CHI outscored the other side 25-10 in the 1st quarter.

Last play

End of Game

Win probability

CHI vs WSH

0255075100Q2Q3Q4

Starters vs bench

production by unit
WSHWSHstarters 73% of pts

Starters(5)

47 PTS · 18 REB · 12 AST

GS 34

Bench(4)

17 PTS · 7 REB · 4 AST

GS 13

CHICHIstarters 85% of pts

Starters(5)

66 PTS · 27 REB · 15 AST

GS 56

Bench(5)

12 PTS · 6 REB · 7 AST

GS 2

Clutch moments · top swings

ranked by WP impact
CHI1st Quarter · 6:12 · 2-12
+7pp77% WP

Elizabeth Williams · makes 2-foot jumper (Ariel Atkins assists)

Linescore (quarters)

Team1234T
WSH1018181864
CHI2510261778

Period scoring

WSH won 2 · CHI won 2

10
25

Q1

Sutton 4

Williams 10

18
10

Q2

Iriafen 4

Cardoso 6

18
26

Q3

Citron 5

Atkins 6

18
17

Q4

Citron 5

Atkins 7

WSH
CHI

Shooting comparison

WSH
CHI

42%

27-65

FG

54%

34-63

13%

2-15

3PT

27%

4-15

53%

8-15

FT

67%

6-9

Play-by-play · 366 plays

period
event
player
  1. Q4·0.0

    End of Game

    WSH 64·CHI 78

  2. Q4·0.0

    End of the 4th Quarter

    WSH 64·CHI 78

  3. Q4·15.3

    Ariel Atkins makes 1-foot two point shot

    WSH 64·CHI 78

  4. Q4·33.0

    Elizabeth Williams defensive rebound

    WSH 64·CHI 76

  5. Q4·35.5

    Lucy Olsen misses 22-foot pullup jump shot

    WSH 64·CHI 76

  6. Q4·44.6

    Mystics timeout

    WSH 64·CHI 76

  7. Q4·44.6

    Ariel Atkins makes 24-foot three point jumper (Elizabeth Williams assists)

    ·

    WSH 64·CHI 76

  8. Q4·1:02

    Sky timeout

    WSH 64·CHI 73

  9. Q4·1:02

    Sky defensive team rebound

    WSH 64·CHI 73

  10. Q4·1:03

    Jade Melbourne misses 26-foot three point jumper

    WSH 64·CHI 73

    +0.7pp

  11. Q4·1:13

    8 second turnover

    WSH 64·CHI 73

    0.7pp

  12. Q4·1:17

    Sky Full timeout

    WSH 64·CHI 73

  13. Q4·1:21

    Jade Melbourne makes 7-foot driving floating jump shot

    WSH 64·CHI 73

  14. Q4·1:26

    Rachel Banham makes driving layup

    WSH 62·CHI 73

  15. Q4·1:47

    Elizabeth Williams enters the game for Hailey Van Lith

    ·

    WSH 62·CHI 71

  16. Q4·1:47

    Ariel Atkins enters the game for Maddy Westbeld

    ·

    WSH 62·CHI 71

  17. Q4·1:47

    Emily Engstler personal foul

    WSH 62·CHI 71

  18. Q4·1:50

    Lucy Olsen makes free throw 1 of 1

    WSH 62·CHI 71

    +0.6pp

  19. Q4·1:50

    Rachel Banham shooting foul

    WSH 61·CHI 71

    2pp

  20. Q4·1:50

    Lucy Olsen makes driving layup (Sug Sutton assists)

    ·

    WSH 61·CHI 71

  21. Q4·2:03

    Jade Melbourne enters the game for Sonia Citron

    ·

    WSH 59·CHI 71

  22. Q4·2:03

    Hailey Van Lith steps out of bounds turnover

    WSH 59·CHI 71

  23. Q4·2:17

    Rachel Banham enters the game for Ariel Atkins

    ·

    WSH 59·CHI 71

    +1pp

  24. Q4·2:17

    Sug Sutton enters the game for Jade Melbourne

    ·

    WSH 59·CHI 71

  25. Q4·2:17

    Hailey Van Lith enters the game for Sevgi Uzun

    ·

    WSH 59·CHI 71

  26. Q4·2:17

    Maddy Westbeld enters the game for Elizabeth Williams

    ·

    WSH 59·CHI 71

  27. Q4·2:17

    Sky Full timeout

    WSH 59·CHI 71

  28. Q4·2:17

    Emily Engstler makes layup (Aaliyah Edwards assists)

    ·

    WSH 59·CHI 71

  29. Q4·2:24

    Sevgi Uzun bad pass (Sonia Citron steals)

    ·

    WSH 57·CHI 71

  30. Q4·2:41

    Sonia Citron makes 25-foot three point shot (Jade Melbourne assists)

    ·

    WSH 57·CHI 71

Team stats

WSH

Away

Stat

CHI

Home

27-65

fieldGoalsMade-fieldGoalsAttempted

34-63

42

FG %

54

2-15

threePointFieldGoalsMade-threePointFieldGoalsAttempted

4-15

8-15

freeThrowsMade-freeThrowsAttempted

6-9

16

Assists

22

11

Turnovers

18

Model ensemble · how the prediction is built

3 sub-models, blended.

Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.

27.3%

ensemble · WSH favored

  • Elo Static

    fallback · inputs missing

    50.0%

    P(CHI win)

    30%

    weight

  • Elo Recent

    fallback · inputs missing

    50.0%

    P(CHI win)

    37%

    weight

  • Pace Efficiency

    fallback · inputs missing

    50.0%

    P(CHI win)

    33%

    weight

Disagreement

0.00 pp

weighted σ across sub-models

Confidence

100% · high

maps from disagreement

Substrate count

0 / 3 active

ones with full inputs tonight

Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.

Player projections

CHI vs WSH.

Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.

100

projections · 0 high confidence

Points

  • Shakira AustinWSH
    17.1± 6.1low
  • Rickea JacksonCHI
    16.0± 11.0low
  • Sonia CitronWSH
    15.8± 11.7low

Rebounds

  • Kiki IriafenWSH
    9.6± 5.6low
  • Shakira AustinWSH
    8.7± 4.7low
  • Kamilla CardosoCHI
    8.5± 5.1low

Assists

  • Skylar DigginsCHI
    5.4± 3.0low
  • Natasha CloudCHI
    4.4± 4.7low
  • Georgia AmooreWSH
    3.6± 2.4low

Blocks

  • Kamilla CardosoCHI
    1.2± 1.4low
  • Rickea JacksonCHI
    1.2± 1.6low
  • Shakira AustinWSH
    1.1± 1.6low

Steals

  • Rori HarmonWSH
    1.4± 1.7low
  • Aicha CoulibalyCHI
    1.3± 1.2low
  • Angela DugalicWSH
    1.2± 1.6low

Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands

Matchup · 2026

Team rate stats vs league

wehoop

WSH

WSH

league avg

CHI

CHI

45.7%

FG%

44.7

41.1%

28.0%

3PT %

32.6

25.9%

83.4

PPG

85.4

82.8

18.7

Assists / G

18.0

19.3

15.6

Turnovers / G

13.0

11.0

Data via ESPN · wehoop