Free during beta —to track favorites + alerts
FINAL+7GS
GS

GS

14-13

7366
CHI

CHI

7-20

Historical comparables

Games like this · top 6 from 310 candidates

basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year

WNBAFri, Aug 1FinalSeriesGS wins series 3-0

Recap · WNBA

olden State Valkyries went into Chicago Sky and beat them, 73–66.

ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.

ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page

WNBA · Golden State Valkyries at Chicago Sky · final

WNBA · Box scoreTRACKING

Final
73
66
GS14-13CHI7-20
GS

GS

14-13

73
CoreReboundsPlaymakingDefenseDiscipline
PlayerMINPTSREBASTSTLBLKTO+/-
351692101+7
18442000+8
21342112-4
311847211+19
221111111-11
92200020
241410100+5
17552000+8
24023002+3
Team733219639
DNP: K. Thornton, M. Billings, C. Zandalasini, T. Hayes
CHI

CHI

7-20

66
CoreReboundsPlaymakingDefenseDiscipline
PlayerMINPTSREBASTSTLBLKTO+/-
3015830210
3514111012-7
281457104-8
30342020-14
321037001+2
14300010+1
14210000-5
18541102-4
Team6636212610
DNP: A. Reese, C. Vandersloot, A. Atkins, H. Van Lith

Stat compare

Headline stats · full table below

37

FG %

42

19

Ast

21

Season series

GS wins series 3-0

Jun 28CHICHI78@GSGS83
Aug 1GSGS73@CHICHI66today
Aug 15GSGS90@CHICHI59

Headlines · top performers

Game flowGS CHI

Biggest swing: 16pp · 4th Quarter · 3:41

GSGS
V. Burton

V. Burton

G

Game leader · 31 min

18 PTS · 4 REB · 7 AST

CHICHI
E. Williams

E. Williams

C

Game leader · 30 min

15 PTS · 8 REB · 3 AST

How it ended

GS beat CHI 73-66. V. Burton led with 18 PTS, 4 REB, 7 AST. GS outscored the other side 21-12 in the 4th quarter.

Last play

End of Game

Win probability

CHI vs GS

0255075100Q2Q3Q4

Starters vs bench

production by unit
GSGSstarters 71% of pts

Starters(5)

52 PTS · 22 REB · 14 AST

GS 40

Bench(4)

21 PTS · 10 REB · 5 AST

GS 14

CHICHIstarters 85% of pts

Starters(5)

56 PTS · 31 REB · 20 AST

GS 46

Bench(3)

10 PTS · 5 REB · 1 AST

GS 3

Clutch moments · top swings

ranked by WP impact
GS4th Quarter · 3:41 · 64-60
+16pp78% WP

Kia Nurse · misses 19-foot pullup jump shot

GS4th Quarter · 3:13 · 67-62
+13pp80% WP

Iliana Rupert · makes 25-foot three point jumper (Veronica Burton assists)

GS4th Quarter · 2:13 · 69-66
+16pp83% WP

Kia Nurse · shooting foul

Linescore (quarters)

Team1234T
GS1423152173
CHI1522171266

Period scoring

GS won 2 · CHI won 2

14
15

Q1

Leite 5

Williams 4

23
22

Q2

Burton 5

Banham 5

15
17

Q3

Salaun 5

Banham 5

21
12

Q4

Rupert 9

Cardoso 4

GS
CHI

Shooting comparison

GS
CHI

37%

24-65

FG

42%

27-64

33%

10-30

3PT

27%

6-22

94%

15-16

FT

60%

6-10

Play-by-play · 357 plays

period
event
player
  1. Q4·0.0

    End of Game

    GS 73·CHI 66

  2. Q4·0.0

    End of the 4th Quarter

    GS 73·CHI 66

  3. Q4·8.4

    Rachel Banham bad pass (Veronica Burton steals)

    ·

    GS 73·CHI 66

    0.6pp

  4. Q4·16.2

    Sky timeout

    GS 73·CHI 66

  5. Q4·16.2

    Veronica Burton makes free throw 2 of 2

    GS 73·CHI 66

  6. Q4·16.2

    Veronica Burton makes free throw 1 of 2

    GS 72·CHI 66

  7. Q4·16.2

    Elizabeth Williams personal foul

    GS 71·CHI 66

    2pp

  8. Q4·19.2

    Veronica Burton defensive rebound

    GS 71·CHI 66

    0.7pp

  9. Q4·19.2

    Rebecca Allen misses 23-foot three point jumper

    GS 71·CHI 66

    2pp

  10. Q4·20.7

    Kamilla Cardoso offensive rebound

    GS 71·CHI 66

    +2pp

  11. Q4·22.8

    Rachel Banham misses 14-foot pullup jump shot

    GS 71·CHI 66

    5pp

  12. Q4·34.6

    Sky Full timeout

    GS 71·CHI 66

  13. Q4·34.6

    Veronica Burton makes free throw 2 of 2

    GS 71·CHI 66

    +3pp

  14. Q4·34.6

    Veronica Burton makes free throw 1 of 2

    GS 70·CHI 66

    0.9pp

  15. Q4·34.6

    Rachel Banham personal foulBIG MOMENT

    GS 69·CHI 66

    8pp

  16. Q4·44.3

    Kia Nurse bad pass (Iliana Rupert steals)BIG MOMENT

    ·

    GS 69·CHI 66

    11pp

  17. Q4·48.5

    Rebecca Allen defensive rebound

    GS 69·CHI 66

    +2pp

  18. Q4·51.3

    Rebecca Allen blocks Veronica Burton 's 2-foot driving layupBIG MOMENT

    ·

    GS 69·CHI 66

    +6pp

  19. Q4·1:01

    Temi Fagbenle defensive rebound

    GS 69·CHI 66

    3pp

  20. Q4·1:07

    Rachel Banham misses 25-foot three point pullup jump shotBIG MOMENT

    GS 69·CHI 66

    8pp

  21. Q4·1:27

    Sky defensive team rebound

    GS 69·CHI 66

    +2pp

  22. Q4·1:27

    Janelle Salaun misses 7-foot two point shotBIG MOMENT

    GS 69·CHI 66

    +5pp

  23. Q4·1:43

    Kaila Charles defensive rebound

    GS 69·CHI 66

    2pp

  24. Q4·1:45

    Rachel Banham misses driving layupBIG MOMENT

    GS 69·CHI 66

    6pp

  25. Q4·1:53

    Iliana Rupert vs. Elizabeth Williams (Rebecca Allen gains possession)

    · ·

    GS 69·CHI 66

    0.6pp

  26. Q4·2:10

    Elizabeth Williams defensive rebound

    GS 69·CHI 66

  27. Q4·2:13

    Janelle Salaun misses free throw 1 of 1BIG MOMENT

    GS 69·CHI 66

    +13pp

  28. Q4·2:13

    Kia Nurse shooting foulBIG MOMENT

    GS 69·CHI 66

    16pp

  29. Q4·2:13

    Janelle Salaun makes driving layup (Veronica Burton assists)BIG MOMENT

    ·

    GS 69·CHI 66

    +9pp

  30. Q4·2:23

    Temi Fagbenle enters the game for Kate Martin

    ·

    GS 67·CHI 66

Team stats

GS

Away

Stat

CHI

Home

24-65

fieldGoalsMade-fieldGoalsAttempted

27-64

37

FG %

42

10-30

threePointFieldGoalsMade-threePointFieldGoalsAttempted

6-22

15-16

freeThrowsMade-freeThrowsAttempted

6-10

19

Assists

21

9

Turnovers

10

Model ensemble · how the prediction is built

3 sub-models, blended.

Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.

27.3%

ensemble · GS favored

  • Elo Static

    fallback · inputs missing

    50.0%

    P(CHI win)

    30%

    weight

  • Elo Recent

    fallback · inputs missing

    50.0%

    P(CHI win)

    37%

    weight

  • Pace Efficiency

    fallback · inputs missing

    50.0%

    P(CHI win)

    33%

    weight

Disagreement

0.00 pp

weighted σ across sub-models

Confidence

100% · high

maps from disagreement

Substrate count

0 / 3 active

ones with full inputs tonight

Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.

Player projections

CHI vs GS.

Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.

95

projections · 0 high confidence

Points

  • Rickea JacksonCHI
    16.0± 11.0low
  • Veronica BurtonGS
    15.6± 5.8low
  • Gabby WilliamsGS
    14.3± 7.5low

Rebounds

  • Kamilla CardosoCHI
    8.5± 5.1low
  • Kaila CharlesGS
    6.3± 2.4low
  • Elizabeth WilliamsCHI
    4.9± 3.6low

Assists

  • Veronica BurtonGS
    5.5± 4.2low
  • Skylar DigginsCHI
    5.4± 3.0low
  • Natasha CloudCHI
    4.4± 4.7low

Blocks

  • Kiah StokesGS
    1.8± 2.7low
  • Kamilla CardosoCHI
    1.2± 1.4low
  • Rickea JacksonCHI
    1.2± 1.6low

Steals

  • Gabby WilliamsGS
    1.9± 2.4low
  • Aicha CoulibalyCHI
    1.3± 1.2low
  • Jacy SheldonCHI
    1.1± 2.0low

Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands

Matchup · 2026

Team rate stats vs league

wehoop

GS

GS

league avg

CHI

CHI

41.3%

FG%

44.7

41.1%

36.1%

3PT %

32.6

25.9%

86.4

PPG

85.4

82.8

19.1

Assists / G

18.0

19.3

10.1

Turnovers / G

13.0

11.0

Data via ESPN · wehoop