
CHW
17-20

LAA
15-23
Line movement
200 snapshots
LAA spread
+1.5
open +1.5
Total
O/U 9.0
open O/U 9.0
LAA no-vig %
48.9%
open 48.9%
Stepped lines reflect captured market snapshots from odds_snapshots. Spread sign convention: negative = LAA favored. Live mode caps the in-game branch to the last 60 minutes.
Logged before first pitch · graded in public
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
CHW
league avg
LAA
.729
OPS
.719
.721
.319
OBP
.319
.320
4.64
Runs / G
4.50
4.57
4.41
Team ERA
4.19
4.65
1.34
WHIP
1.31
1.43
8.3
K / 9
8.5
▶8.8
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
LAA wins
CHW 2 · LAA 8 (by 6)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked CHW +1pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHW | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| LAA | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
CHW · top performer

Luisangel Acuna
CF
1-1
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
LAA · top performer

Travis d'Arnaud
C
2-1
AB-H
1
R
3
RBI
Biggest swing: 28pp · Bottom 2nd Inning
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .262 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .237 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | |
| .215 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .227 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .278 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .234 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .286 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .263 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .188 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| .200 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .233 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .175 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 29 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 10 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.2 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 79 | |
| 2.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 11 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 20 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 137 |
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .221 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| .260 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .264 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .238 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| .258 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| .278 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .255 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .200 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| .278 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .273 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 29 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 90 | |
| 0.2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 20 | |
| 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | |
| 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 28 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 149 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantCHW
LAA
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
4
Hits
8
2
Runs
8
0
Errors
0
Team stats
CHW
Away
Stat
LAA
Home
2
Runs
8
4
Hits
8
0
Errors
0
5
TB
14
0
HR
1
5
BB
6
10
K
5
14
LOB
16
Current series
LAA win series 2-1
Season series
CHW win series 4-2
Model & market
Vegas line center
DraftKings via ESPN · 21+
Spread
CHW -1.5
Total
9.0
High-scoring · +0.5 vs avg
Moneyline
Implied probabilities back-computed from American odds — break-even win % a moneyline bet needs to be +EV.
How it ended
LAA beat CHW 8-2. T. d'Arnaud led the way — 1-for-2 · 1 HR · 2.500 OPS. Biggest WP swing of the night came in the bottom 2nd inning (28pp).
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactTrout · fouled out to first.
Soler · singled to center.
d'Arnaud homered to left (396 feet), Soler scored and Schanuel scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHW | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| LAA | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — | 8 |
Betting line
CHW -1.5·O/U 9·CHW -113/LAA -107
Recap · MLB
os Angeles Angels held off Chicago White Sox, 8–2. It was a wire-to-wire rout.
LAA +1.5 cashed (CHW lost outright). Total cleared the 9.0 OVER by 1.0.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
Line movement · 200 snapshots
ESPN-tracked · 21+
Spread
1.5
0.0 since open
Total
9.0
0.0 since open
Win probability
LAA vs CHW
Period scoring
CHW won 1 · LAA won 3
Inn 1
Inn 2
Benintendi 1
Neto 1
Inn 3
Inn 4
Soler 1
Inn 5
Inn 6
Inn 7
Antonacci 1
Inn 8
Neto 1
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 565 plays
· ·
CHW 2·LAA 8
Romo flied out to left.
· ·
CHW 2·LAA 8
Pitch 5 : Ball In Play
· ·
CHW 2·LAA 8
Pitch 4 : Ball 3
· ·
CHW 2·LAA 8
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
· ·
CHW 2·LAA 8
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
CHW 2·LAA 8
Acuña to second on fielder's indifference.
·
CHW 2·LAA 8
Acuña to second on fielder's indifference.
·
CHW 2·LAA 8
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
CHW 2·LAA 8
Chase Silseth pitches to Drew Romo
· ·
CHW 2·LAA 8
·
CHW 2·LAA 8
Acuña reached on infield single to third.
·
CHW 2·LAA 8
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
CHW 2·LAA 8
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
CHW 2·LAA 8
Chase Silseth pitches to Luisangel Acuna
·
CHW 2·LAA 8
·
CHW 2·LAA 8
Grichuk grounded out to third.
·
CHW 2·LAA 8
Pitch 1 : Ball In Play
·
CHW 2·LAA 8
Chase Silseth pitches to Randal Grichuk
·
CHW 2·LAA 8
·
CHW 2·LAA 8
Benintendi struck out looking.
·
CHW 2·LAA 8
Pitch 6 : Strike 3 Looking
·
CHW 2·LAA 8
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CHW 2·LAA 8
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
CHW 2·LAA 8
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
·
CHW 2·LAA 8
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
CHW 2·LAA 8
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CHW 2·LAA 8
Chase Silseth pitches to Andrew Benintendi
·
CHW 2·LAA 8
Top of the 9th inning
CHW 2·LAA 8
End of the 8th inning
CHW 2·LAA 8
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
127
projections · 75 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
50.4%
ensemble · LAA favored
Elo Static
49.0%
P(LAA win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
53.1%
P(LAA win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
50.4%
P(LAA win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
1.68 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
89% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.