
PHI
13-20

MIA
16-17
Line movement
88 snapshots
MIA spread
-1.5
open +1.5 · -3.0
Total
O/U 8.5
open O/U 8.5
MIA no-vig %
54.0%
open 52.2% · +1.9
Stepped lines reflect captured market snapshots from odds_snapshots. Spread sign convention: negative = MIA favored. Live mode caps the in-game branch to the last 60 minutes.
Logged before first pitch · graded in public
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
PHI
league avg
MIA
.694
OPS
.719
▶.708
.299
OBP
.319
▶.322
4.22
Runs / G
4.50
▶4.28
4.07
Team ERA
4.18
4.07
1.30
WHIP
1.31
▶1.26
9.5
K / 9
8.5
8.8
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
MIA wins
PHI 0 · MIA 4 (by 4)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked PHI +0pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MIA | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
The receipts
-1.86
CLV pp · steam
Open price
+100
Close price
+108
Open no-vig
47.8%
Close no-vig
46.0%
Market faded the model hard · Graded: miss
Logged before tip · graded in public
How we read this game
PHI · top performer

Garrett Stubbs
C
2-1
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
MIA · top performer

Xavier Edwards
2B
4-2
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
Biggest swing: 10pp · Bottom 3rd Inning
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .244 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .210 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| .256 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .235 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .204 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .161 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .246 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .273 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .125 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .277 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 27 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.0 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 99 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 20 | |
| 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 24 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 10 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 143 |
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .175 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| .205 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .336 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .336 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| .309 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .239 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
| .247 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .188 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .300 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| .143 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .303 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 33 | 4 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 10 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 83 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 111 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantPHI
MIA
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
1
Hits
10
0
Runs
4
0
Errors
0
Team stats
PHI
Away
Stat
MIA
Home
0
Runs
4
1
Hits
10
0
Errors
0
1
TB
15
0
HR
1
1
BB
6
10
K
10
2
LOB
21
Current series
PHI wins series 3-1
Season series
Series tied 1-1
Model & market
Vegas line center
DraftKings via ESPN · 21+
Spread
MIA -1.5
Total
8.5
Standard · 0.0 vs avg
Moneyline
Implied probabilities back-computed from American odds — break-even win % a moneyline bet needs to be +EV.
Line movement · 88 snapshots
ESPN-tracked · 21+
Spread
1.5
0.0 since open
Total
8.5
0.0 since open
How it ended
MIA beat PHI 4-0. X. Edwards led the way — 2-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.750 OPS.
Win probability
MIA vs PHI
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactPauley · fouled out to third.
Ram · írez walked, Stowers scored, Edwards to second, Lopez to third.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MIA | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | 4 |
Period scoring
PHI won 0 · MIA won 3
Inn 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Ram 1
Inn 4
Inn 5
Edwards 1
Inn 6
Lopez 1
Inn 7
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 495 plays
·
PHI 0·MIA 4
Turner flied out to center.
·
PHI 0·MIA 4
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
PHI 0·MIA 4
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
·
PHI 0·MIA 4
Andrew Nardi pitches to Trea Turner
·
PHI 0·MIA 4
·
PHI 0·MIA 4
Reyes struck out swinging.
·
PHI 0·MIA 4
Pitch 6 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
PHI 0·MIA 4
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
·
PHI 0·MIA 4
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
·
PHI 0·MIA 4
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Looking
·
PHI 0·MIA 4
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Swinging
·
PHI 0·MIA 4
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
PHI 0·MIA 4
Andrew Nardi pitches to Felix Reyes
·
PHI 0·MIA 4
·
PHI 0·MIA 4
Sosa lined out to first.
·
PHI 0·MIA 4
+0.8pp
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
PHI 0·MIA 4
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
PHI 0·MIA 4
Andrew Nardi pitches to Edmundo Sosa
·
PHI 0·MIA 4
Nardi relieved Bender
·
PHI 0·MIA 4
Sosa hit for Stubbs
·
PHI 0·MIA 4
Top of the 9th inning
PHI 0·MIA 4
End of the 8th inning
PHI 0·MIA 4
· ·
PHI 0·MIA 4
Lopez grounded out to shortstop.
· ·
PHI 0·MIA 4
Pitch 1 : Ball In Play
· ·
PHI 0·MIA 4
Trevor Richards pitches to Otto Lopez
· ·
PHI 0·MIA 4
· ·
PHI 0·MIA 4
Stowers flied out to left.
· ·
PHI 0·MIA 4
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
· ·
PHI 0·MIA 4
Betting line
MIA -1.5·O/U 8.5·PHI +108/MIA -130
Recap · MLB
iami Marlins held off Philadelphia Phillies, 4–0.
MIA -1.5 cashed (won by 4). Total stayed UNDER 8.5 by 4.5.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
121
projections · 92 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
50.6%
ensemble · MIA favored
Elo Static
49.7%
P(MIA win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
54.2%
P(MIA win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
49.1%
P(MIA win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
2.26 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
85% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.