
PIT
52-72

CHC
69-53
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
CHC wins
PIT 1 · CHC 3 (by 2)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked CHC +12pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| CHC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
hicago Cubs held off Pittsburgh Pirates, 3–1.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
PIT · top performer

Tommy Pham
LF
3-1
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
CHC · top performer

Kyle Tucker
RF
4-2
AB-H
2
R
0
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


PIT
52-72
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.483 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.969 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.586 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 5-32 | 32 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 11 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 5.0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | |
| 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0.1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0 |
CHC
69-53
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT25.716 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT26.123 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.457 | ||||||||
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.716 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.278 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 9-30 | 30 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 7.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 1 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 1 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantPIT
CHC
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
5
Hits
9
1
Runs
3
0
Errors
0
Current series
CHC win series 5-2
Season series
CHC lead series 6-3
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 18pp · Bottom 8th Inning
T. Pham
LFBatter of the game
1-for-3 · 1 HR · 1.833 OPS
M. Burrows
SPStarting pitcher
5.0 IP · 4 K · 1 ER · 5 H · 2 BB
K. Tucker
RFBatter of the game
2-for-4 · 2 R · 1.000 OPS
S. Imanaga
SPStarting pitcherQuality start
7.0 IP · 6 K · 1 ER · 3 H · 2 BB
How it ended
CHC beat PIT 3-1. Suzuki's play in the bottom 8th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (18pp).
Win probability
CHC vs PIT
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactPham · homered to left (428 feet).
Kelly · singled to center, Tucker scored, Crow-Armstrong to third.
Suzuki · singled to center, Tucker scored, Suzuki to second.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| CHC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | — | 3 |
Period scoring
PIT won 0 · CHC won 1
Inn 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Pham 1
Kelly 1
Inn 5
Inn 6
Inn 7
Inn 8
Suzuki 1
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 488 plays
· ·
PIT 1·CHC 3
Horwitz struck out swinging.
· ·
PIT 1·CHC 3
+3pp
Pitch 4 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
PIT 1·CHC 3
N. Gonzales to second on fielder's indifference.
·
PIT 1·CHC 3
N. Gonzales to second on fielder's indifference.
·
PIT 1·CHC 3
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
PIT 1·CHC 3
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
PIT 1·CHC 3
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
PIT 1·CHC 3
Brad Keller pitches to Spencer Horwitz
· ·
PIT 1·CHC 3
Horwitz hit for Peguero
·
PIT 1·CHC 3
· ·
PIT 1·CHC 3
Bart struck out looking.
· ·
PIT 1·CHC 3
+4pp
Pitch 5 : Strike 3 Looking
· ·
PIT 1·CHC 3
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
PIT 1·CHC 3
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
· ·
PIT 1·CHC 3
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
PIT 1·CHC 3
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
PIT 1·CHC 3
Brad Keller pitches to Joey Bart
· ·
PIT 1·CHC 3
· ·
PIT 1·CHC 3
McCutchen struck out looking.BIG MOMENT
· ·
PIT 1·CHC 3
+6pp
Pitch 5 : Strike 3 Looking
· ·
PIT 1·CHC 3
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Swinging
· ·
PIT 1·CHC 3
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
· ·
PIT 1·CHC 3
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
PIT 1·CHC 3
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
PIT 1·CHC 3
Brad Keller pitches to Andrew McCutchen
· ·
PIT 1·CHC 3
·
PIT 1·CHC 3
N. Gonzales singled to center.BIG MOMENT
·
PIT 1·CHC 3
−7pp
Pitch 6 : Ball In Play
·
PIT 1·CHC 3
Pitch 5 : Ball 3
·
PIT 1·CHC 3
Team stats
PIT
Away
Stat
CHC
Home
1
Runs
3
5
Hits
9
0
Errors
0
9
TB
10
1
HR
0
2
BB
3
11
K
6
9
LOB
18
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
123
projections · 79 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
63.7%
ensemble · CHC favored
Elo Static
62.1%
P(CHC win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
62.3%
P(CHC win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
61.6%
P(CHC win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.30 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
98% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
4 of 14 players in cohortHistorical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs