
Ray Bahner, PD, via Wikimedia Commons
Lead playmaker
Scoring
86
Playmaking
95
Defense
79
Shooting
92
Combine
Max vertical
30.5"p2
Lane agility
11.23sp28
¾ sprint
3.20sp48
Standing reach
99.5"p37
Draft outlook
Projected landing
Outside the top 60
THE ONE has them at #75, below the two-round projection window.
Model vs the field
The One
#75
Field
#78
In line with the field — our board and the consensus agree within a couple of slots.
across 2 mock boards
Scouting summary
Lead playmaker profile. The loudest scout signal: elite bpm (BPM = 94th pct). Their NCAA dominance composite lands at 90 on a 100 scale. Mock consensus pegs them 78th across 2 boards.
Auto-generated from archetype + top deterministic chip · long-form narrative ships when the generator's AI pass is enabled.
Mock consensus over time
Draft score breakdown
avg rank 78 across 2 boards
Deterministic signals · v1 rules
Elite BPM
BPM = 94th pct
High usage + efficient
USG and TS percentiles both clear the v1 trigger
Elite playmaker (G)
AST% = 96th pct
Heavy-legged
max vertical = 2th pct
Consensus fallers
latest consensus slipped by 15 spots
Older for class
age 22.9 at draft; class median 21.9
Trait grades
Combine radar · vs. G-bucket
Wingspan
med 79.8"
80.0"
p51
Standing reach
med 100.0"
99.5"
p37
Max vertical
med 36.5"
30.5"
p2
Standing vert
med 30.0"
28.5"
p29
¾ sprint
med 3.19s
3.20s
p48
Lane agility
med 11.00s
11.23s
p28
Shuttle
med 3.06s
3.14s
p32
College stats · 2025-26 season
30 games · 77% min
labeled Combo G
Name match to Miami OH, prospect card says Miami (Ohio) — possible mid-season transfer or stale label.
Efficiency
Playmaking
Defense
Rebounding
Composite
via BartTorvik · percentiles vs G-bucket of the 2025-26 D1 pool
X-factor · Risk · Scheme fit
Long-form scouting prose ships when the generator's AI narrative pass is enabled. The deterministic chip list above carries the same information as structured signals.
Generated by deterministic-v3-ageadj-consensus · May 30, 2026