Kingston Flemings

Lead playmaker. Carried by perimeter defense (98th) and passing (86th); no glaring statistical hole.

Draft outlook

Where the math lands them

Projected landing

#8

Atlanta Hawks

1st round

Model vs the field

The One

#8

vs

Field

#8

In line with the field — our board and the consensus agree within a couple of slots.

across 3 mock boards

Scouting summary

Lead playmaker profile. The loudest scout signal: elite bpm (BPM = 99th pct). Their NCAA dominance composite lands at 90 on a 100 scale. Mock consensus pegs them 8th across 3 boards.

Auto-generated from archetype + top deterministic chip · long-form narrative ships when the generator's AI pass is enabled.

57 / 100 two-way score

Flemings's offensive + defensive efficiency vs the 2026 class, per Synergy possessions.

Closest NBA comparisons

Matched on combine measurements (length, frame, explosion, agility) and college production (BPM, TS%, usage, assists), within position group. Each comp's tag shows which basis drove it; the college production + career outcome shown belongs to the comp, never projected onto Flemings.

“Top X%” = closer to Flemings than (100−X)% of all drafted guards on the measurables + production; the bar shows relative closeness among these 5.

1. 1Jared Butler2021

   top 1%

   measurables + production · matched on 4 of 9 measurables · 6 of 4 production

   Became: Rotation player · 0.3 career VORP · 148 g

   College: Baylor '21 · TS 59.9 · BPM 9.7

   Reach98.5"vs98.5"Wing75.5"vs76.0"Weight183 lbvs193 lbHt6'3"vs6'2"USG%26.5vs26.9PORPAG5.0vs5.1BPM10.3vs9.7AST%32.6vs27.8TS%56.3vs59.9Age19.5vs20.8
2. 2Coby White2019

   top 1%

   measurables + production · matched on 4 of 9 measurables · 6 of 4 production

   Became: Rotation player · 1.7 career VORP · 472 g

   College: North Carolina '19 · TS 55.6 · BPM 6.7

   Ht6'3"vs6'4"Reach98.5"vs97.5"Weight183 lbvs191 lbWing75.5"vs77.0"Age19.5vs19.4USG%26.5vs26.1TS%56.3vs55.6AST%32.6vs24.4PORPAG5.0vs3.7BPM10.3vs6.7
3. 3Tre Mann2021

   top 1%

   measurables + production · matched on 4 of 9 measurables · 6 of 4 production

   Became: Rotation player · -1.8 career VORP · 234 g

   College: Florida '21 · TS 57.9 · BPM 5.8

   Reach98.5"vs98.5"Ht6'3"vs6'3"Wing75.5"vs76.0"Weight183 lbvs178 lbUSG%26.5vs25.9TS%56.3vs57.9PORPAG5.0vs4.3Age19.5vs20.4AST%32.6vs22.3BPM10.3vs5.8
4. 4Tyler Herro2019

   top 1%

   measurables + production · matched on 4 of 9 measurables · 5 of 4 production

   Became: Star · 1× All-Star · 9.0 career VORP · 394 g

   College: Kentucky '19 · TS 58.0 · BPM 7.8

   Wing75.5"vs75.3"Ht6'3"vs6'5"Weight183 lbvs192 lbReach98.5"vs100.5"TS%56.3vs58.0PORPAG5.0vs4.2BPM10.3vs7.8USG%26.5vs20.0AST%32.6vs15.2
5. 5Nate Wolters2013

   top 2%

   measurables + production · matched on 4 of 9 measurables · 6 of 4 production

   Became: Fringe NBA · -0.2 career VORP · 84 g

   College: South Dakota St. '13 · TS 60.3 · BPM 8.9

   Ht6'3"vs6'4"Wing75.5"vs75.8"Reach98.5"vs98.0"Weight183 lbvs196 lbAST%32.6vs35.1BPM10.3vs8.9TS%56.3vs60.3USG%26.5vs30.8PORPAG5.0vs6.7Age19.5vs22.1

How the closest comps turned out

Median outcome: Rotation — the typical case among these comps, between the floor and ceiling.

The 15 nearest blended comps (2 too recent to grade). These are the comps' own careers — a range of what the profile has become before, not a projection of Flemings.

via BartTorvik · percentiles vs G-bucket of all D1 history (2008-26)

37 games· 31.7 mpg

per-game · via barttorvik · percentiles vs all D1 2008-25 at the position

Raw per-game counts — not pace-adjusted; ranked against an 18-season D1 reference where elite-tier percentiles are stable across the window.