
ESPN
Lead playmaker
Scoring
88
Playmaking
97
Defense
65
Shooting
86
Combine
Max vertical
36.0"p42
Lane agility
11.05sp44
¾ sprint
3.27sp26
Standing reach
100.0"p44
Rare
Rare outlier — top 5% draft score
Draft outlook
Projected landing

#4
Chicago Bulls
1st roundModel vs the field
The One
#4
Field
#5
In line with the field — our board and the consensus agree within a couple of slots.
across 3 mock boards
Scouting summary
Lead playmaker profile. The loudest scout signal: elite bpm (BPM = 99th pct). Their NCAA dominance composite lands at 90 on a 100 scale. Mock consensus pegs them 5th across 3 boards.
Auto-generated from archetype + top deterministic chip · long-form narrative ships when the generator's AI pass is enabled.
Mock consensus over time
Draft score breakdown
avg rank 5 across 3 boards
Consensus floor applied: 91 (top-15 multi-source override)
Deterministic signals · v1 rules
Elite BPM
BPM = 99th pct
High usage + efficient
USG and TS percentiles both clear the v1 trigger
Elite playmaker (G)
AST% = 97th pct
Consensus top-15
average consensus rank 5.3
Young for class
age 19.4 at draft; class median 21.9
Trait grades
Combine radar · vs. G-bucket
Wingspan
med 79.8"
78.3"
p28
Standing reach
med 100.0"
100.0"
p44
Max vertical
med 36.5"
36.0"
p42
Standing vert
med 30.0"
33.0"
p84
¾ sprint
med 3.19s
3.27s
p26
Lane agility
med 11.00s
11.05s
p44
Shuttle
med 3.06s
3.00s
p73
College stats · 2025-26 season
37 games · 84% min
labeled Combo G
Efficiency
Playmaking
Defense
Rebounding
Composite
via BartTorvik · percentiles vs G-bucket of the 2025-26 D1 pool
X-factor · Risk · Scheme fit
Long-form scouting prose ships when the generator's AI narrative pass is enabled. The deterministic chip list above carries the same information as structured signals.
Generated by deterministic-v3-ageadj-consensus · May 30, 2026