
Runnareport, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons
Lead playmaker
Scoring
91
Playmaking
99
Defense
64
Shooting
92
Combine
Max vertical
40.5"p86
Lane agility
10.85sp72
¾ sprint
3.18sp54
Standing reach
96.5"p12
Draft outlook
Projected landing

#17
Oklahoma City Thunder
1st roundModel vs the field
The One
#17
Field
#22
In line with the field — our board and the consensus agree within a couple of slots.
across 3 mock boards
Scouting summary
Lead playmaker profile. The loudest scout signal: elite bpm (BPM = 99th pct). Their NCAA dominance composite lands at 86 on a 100 scale. Mock consensus pegs them 22nd across 3 boards.
Auto-generated from archetype + top deterministic chip · long-form narrative ships when the generator's AI pass is enabled.
Mock consensus over time
Draft score breakdown
avg rank 22 across 3 boards
Deterministic signals · v1 rules
Elite BPM
BPM = 99th pct
High usage + efficient
USG and TS percentiles both clear the v1 trigger
Elite playmaker (G)
AST% = 100th pct
Plus vertical
max vertical = 86th pct
Consensus fallers
latest consensus slipped by 9 spots
Young for class
age 20.2 at draft; class median 21.9
Trait grades
Combine radar · vs. G-bucket
Wingspan
med 79.8"
78.3"
p28
Standing reach
med 100.0"
96.5"
p12
Max vertical
med 36.5"
40.5"
p86
Standing vert
med 30.0"
31.0"
p63
¾ sprint
med 3.19s
3.18s
p54
Lane agility
med 11.00s
10.85s
p72
Shuttle
med 3.06s
2.85s
p89
College stats · 2025-26 season
33 games · 93% min
labeled Pure PG
Efficiency
Playmaking
Defense
Rebounding
Composite
via BartTorvik · percentiles vs G-bucket of the 2025-26 D1 pool
X-factor · Risk · Scheme fit
Long-form scouting prose ships when the generator's AI narrative pass is enabled. The deterministic chip list above carries the same information as structured signals.
Generated by deterministic-v3-ageadj-consensus · May 30, 2026