
ESPN
Two-way wing
Scoring
71
Playmaking
95
Defense
96
Shooting
55
Combine
Max vertical
35.0"p33
Lane agility
11.18sp43
¾ sprint
3.24sp44
Standing reach
104.0"p47
Draft outlook
Projected landing
Outside the top 60
THE ONE has them at #74, below the two-round projection window.
Model vs the field
The One
#74
Field
#70
In line with the field — our board and the consensus agree within a couple of slots.
across 2 mock boards
Scouting summary
Two-way wing profile. The loudest scout signal: plus bpm (BPM = 86th pct). Their NCAA dominance composite lands at 80 on a 100 scale. Mock consensus pegs them 70th across 2 boards.
Auto-generated from archetype + top deterministic chip · long-form narrative ships when the generator's AI pass is enabled.
Mock consensus over time
Draft score breakdown
avg rank 70 across 2 boards
Deterministic signals · v1 rules
Plus BPM
BPM = 86th pct
Defensive impact
STL% + BLK% = 96th pct
Consensus risers
latest consensus improved by 27 spots
Age unknown
birthdate unavailable; no age tilt applied
Trait grades
Combine radar · vs. W-bucket
Wingspan
med 82.8"
82.3"
p40
Standing reach
med 104.0"
104.0"
p47
Max vertical
med 36.0"
35.0"
p33
Standing vert
med 30.0"
28.5"
p31
¾ sprint
med 3.20s
3.24s
p44
Lane agility
med 11.10s
11.18s
p43
Shuttle
med 3.00s
2.48s
p99
College stats · 2025-26 season
30 games · 80% min
labeled Wing G
Name match to Tennessee St., prospect card says Tennessee State — possible mid-season transfer or stale label.
Efficiency
Playmaking
Defense
Rebounding
Composite
via BartTorvik · percentiles vs W-bucket of the 2025-26 D1 pool
X-factor · Risk · Scheme fit
Long-form scouting prose ships when the generator's AI narrative pass is enabled. The deterministic chip list above carries the same information as structured signals.
Generated by deterministic-v3-ageadj-consensus · May 30, 2026