
CHW
17-19

LAA
14-23
Line movement
200 snapshots
LAA spread
+1.5
open +1.5
Total
O/U 9.0
open O/U 9.0
LAA no-vig %
52.6%
open 51.1% · +1.5
Stepped lines reflect captured market snapshots from odds_snapshots. Spread sign convention: negative = LAA favored. Live mode caps the in-game branch to the last 60 minutes.
Logged before first pitch · graded in public
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
CHW
league avg
LAA
.729
OPS
.719
.721
.319
OBP
.319
.320
4.64
Runs / G
4.50
4.57
4.41
Team ERA
4.19
4.65
1.34
WHIP
1.31
1.43
8.3
K / 9
8.5
▶8.8
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
LAA wins
CHW 3 · LAA 4 (by 1)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked LAA +0pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHW | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| LAA | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
CHW · top performer

Chase Meidroth
2B
5-2
AB-H
2
R
1
RBI
LAA · top performer

Mike Trout
CF
2-2
AB-H
2
R
1
RBI
Biggest swing: 23pp · Top 9th Inning
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .269 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
| .222 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| .227 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .333 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .154 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .239 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .238 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .165 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .276 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .308 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| .269 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .244 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 35 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 9 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.2 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 75 | |
| 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 20 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 116 |
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .218 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| .262 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| .256 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .231 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| .264 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .181 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .280 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .333 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .149 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .280 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .242 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 29 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 69 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 11 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 19 | |
| 1.2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 20 | |
| 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 33 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 9 | 152 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantCHW
No arsenal data yet for this team’s pitchers.
LAA
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
8
Hits
7
3
Runs
4
0
Errors
2
Team stats
CHW
Away
Stat
LAA
Home
3
Runs
4
8
Hits
7
0
Errors
2
12
TB
17
1
HR
3
4
BB
2
9
K
5
20
LOB
5
Current series
LAA win series 2-1
Season series
CHW lead series 4-1
Model & market
Vegas line center
DraftKings via ESPN · 21+
Spread
CHW -1.5
Total
9.0
High-scoring · +0.5 vs avg
Moneyline
7· 6.3h
Implied probabilities back-computed from American odds — break-even win % a moneyline bet needs to be +EV.
How it ended
LAA beat CHW 4-3. M. Trout led the way — 2-for-2 · 1 HR · 3.500 OPS. Montgomery's play in the top 9th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (23pp).
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactNeto · homered to left center (410 feet).
Antonacci · hit by pitch.
Montgomery · struck out swinging.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHW | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| LAA | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 4 |
Betting line
CHW -1.5·O/U 9·CHW -103/LAA -117
Recap · MLB
os Angeles Angels held off Chicago White Sox, 4–3. It came down to the final possession.
LAA +1.5 cashed (CHW lost outright). Total stayed UNDER 9.0 by 2.0.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
Line movement · 200 snapshots
ESPN-tracked · 21+
Spread
1.5
0.0 since open
Total
9.0
0.0 since open
Win probability
LAA vs CHW
Period scoring
CHW won 1 · LAA won 1
Inn 1
Grichuk 1
Trout 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Inn 5
Neto 1
Inn 6
Inn 7
Meidroth 1
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 539 plays
· ·
CHW 3·LAA 4
Quero grounded out to second.BIG MOMENT
· ·
CHW 3·LAA 4
+22pp
Pitch 5 : Ball In Play
· ·
CHW 3·LAA 4
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
· ·
CHW 3·LAA 4
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
CHW 3·LAA 4
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
CHW 3·LAA 4
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
CHW 3·LAA 4
Ryan Zeferjahn pitches to Edgar Quero
· ·
CHW 3·LAA 4
· ·
CHW 3·LAA 4
Kelenic walked.BIG MOMENT
· ·
CHW 3·LAA 4
−6pp
Pitch 6 : Ball 4
· ·
CHW 3·LAA 4
Pitch 5 : Ball 3
· ·
CHW 3·LAA 4
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Swinging
· ·
CHW 3·LAA 4
Vargas stole second.
· ·
CHW 3·LAA 4
Vargas stole second.
· ·
CHW 3·LAA 4
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
· ·
CHW 3·LAA 4
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
CHW 3·LAA 4
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
CHW 3·LAA 4
Ryan Zeferjahn pitches to Jarred Kelenic
· ·
CHW 3·LAA 4
· ·
CHW 3·LAA 4
Montgomery struck out swinging.BIG MOMENT
· ·
CHW 3·LAA 4
+23pp
Pitch 5 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
CHW 3·LAA 4
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
CHW 3·LAA 4
Pitch 3 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
CHW 3·LAA 4
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
· ·
CHW 3·LAA 4
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
CHW 3·LAA 4
Ryan Zeferjahn pitches to Colson Montgomery
· ·
CHW 3·LAA 4
· ·
CHW 3·LAA 4
Vargas walked.BIG MOMENT
· ·
CHW 3·LAA 4
−7pp
Pitch 4 : Ball 4
· ·
CHW 3·LAA 4
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
127
projections · 75 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
50.5%
ensemble · LAA favored
Elo Static
50.4%
P(LAA win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
50.3%
P(LAA win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
51.8%
P(LAA win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.69 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
95% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.