Which side does The One Analytics' model favor in PHI at CHC?

The model favors CHC, based on a weighted edge across matchup factors. The pick is logged before the game and graded in public.

When is the pick logged, and can it change?

Every model pick is timestamped before the game starts and is never edited after the fact.

How is the pick graded?

In public, the moment the game goes final — wins and losses alike, with the full record on the model accuracy page.

Philadelphia Phillies vs Chicago Cubs: Final Score & Box Score — Apr 21, 2026

FINAL+3CHC

PHI

8-15

CHC

14-9

Wrigley Field · Chicago, Illinois

30,651 attended

Line movement

41 snapshots

CHC spread

+1.5

open +1.5

Total

O/U 8.5

open O/U 8.5

CHC no-vig %

53.2%

open 53.2%

Stepped lines reflect captured market snapshots from odds_snapshots. Spread sign convention: negative = CHC favored. Live mode caps the in-game branch to the last 60 minutes.

Logged before first pitch · graded in public

Model ensemble · how the prediction is built

3 sub-models, blended.

Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.

60.2%

ensemble · CHC favored

Elo Static
59.6%
P(CHC win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
59.6%
P(CHC win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
59.8%
P(CHC win)
34%
weight

Disagreement

0.10 pp

weighted σ across sub-models

Confidence

99% · high

maps from disagreement

Substrate count

3 / 3 active

ones with full inputs tonight

Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.

The receipts

Closing-line value.

0.00

CLV pp

Open price

-126

Close price

-126

Open no-vig

53.2%

Close no-vig

53.2%

Line barely moved · Graded: hit

Logged before tip · graded in public

How we read this game

Which side does The One Analytics' model favor in PHI at CHC?: The model favors CHC, based on a weighted edge across matchup factors. The pick is logged before the game and graded in public.
When is the pick logged, and can it change?: Every model pick is timestamped before the game starts and is never edited after the fact.
How is the pick graded?: In public, the moment the game goes final — wins and losses alike, with the full record on the model accuracy page.

Player projections

CHC vs PHI.

Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.

125

projections · 92 high confidence

Strikeouts

Cristopher SanchezPHI
7.7± 3.3medium
Jesus LuzardoPHI
6.4± 2.8medium
Zack WheelerPHI
6.3± 2.6low

Hits

Pete Crow-ArmstrongCHC
1.6± 1.1high
Seiya SuzukiCHC
1.2± 0.8high
Kyle SchwarberPHI
1.2± 1.3high

Total bases

Pete Crow-ArmstrongCHC
3.4± 2.5high
Kyle SchwarberPHI
2.6± 3.9high
Seiya SuzukiCHC
2.0± 1.6high

RBIs

Kyle SchwarberPHI
0.9± 2.0high
Seiya SuzukiCHC
0.8± 1.3high
Carson KellyCHC
0.7± 1.9high

Earned runs

Edward CabreraCHC
3.4± 2.6low
Aaron NolaPHI
3.3± 2.2medium
Shota ImanagaCHC
3.1± 3.4medium

Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands

Matchup · 2026

Team rate stats vs league

MLB Stats API

PHI

league avg

CHC

.692

OPS

.718

▶

.738

.298

OBP

.319

▶

.337

4.18

Runs / G

4.50

▶

4.75

4.06

Team ERA

◀

4.18

4.28

1.30

WHIP

1.31

▶

1.24

9.5

K / 9

◀

8.5

7.9

Postgame · final

The morning-after recap.

Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.

Final

CHC wins

PHI 4 · CHC 7 (by 3)

Model verdict

✓ Hit

Picked CHC +10pp

Against the spread

No spread

Line score

Inning by inning

Team	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	R
PHI	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	2	1	4
CHC	0	0	0	0	1	2	3	1	7

What's next

Tomorrow's slate is open.

See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.

MLB edges →Full slate →

Tomorrow's board↗Tomorrow's board↗

21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.

Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant

batting box score. Tap a column header to sort by that stat; tap again to reverse, a third time to clear. The team leader in each stat is highlighted. Players who did not play are listed at the bottom.
Player
T. TurnerSS	.234	4	0	0	0	0	1	1
K. SchwarberDH	.217	3	2	1	1	1	1	0
B. Harper1B	.274	4	1	1	2	1	0	1
F. ReyesLF	.286	4	0	1	0	0	0	0
A. GarciaRF	.210	4	1	1	0	0	0	0
J.T. RealmutoC	.259	4	0	0	0	0	0	0
A. Bohm3B	.128	3	0	0	1	0	0	0
B. MarshLF	.276	4	0	2	0	0	0	0
E. Sosa2B	.219	4	0	0	0	0	0	1
Team		34	4	6	4	2	2	3

Player

.234

.217

.274

.286

.210

.259

.128

.276

.219

Team

pitching box score. Tap a column header to sort by that stat; tap again to reverse, a third time to clear. The team leader in each stat is highlighted. Players who did not play are listed at the bottom.
Player
J. LuzardoSP	4.2	5	1	1	4	3	100
O. KerkeringRP	0.1	0	0	0	2	0	15
T. BanksRP	1.0	3	2	2	2	1	30
T. MayzaRP	1.0	2	3	3	1	1	23
J. AlvaradoRP	0.1	2	1	1	1	1	23
B. KellerRP	0.2	0	0	0	0	0	3
Team	8.0	12	7	7	10	6	194

Player

J. LuzardoSP

4.2

100

0.1

1.0

1.0

0.1

0.2

Team

8.0

194

batting box score. Tap a column header to sort by that stat; tap again to reverse, a third time to clear. The team leader in each stat is highlighted. Players who did not play are listed at the bottom.
Player
N. Hoerner2B	.326	5	2	2	1	1	0	0
A. Bregman3B	.245	4	1	1	0	0	2	0
I. HappLF	.244	4	2	1	0	0	2	0
S. SuzukiRF	.256	4	1	2	2	1	0	1
C. KellyC	.310	4	0	1	0	0	1	1
M. Busch1B	.173	4	1	1	2	0	1	1
D. SwansonSS	.187	2	0	0	0	0	3	1
M. ShawRF	.281	2	0	1	0	0	0	1
P. Crow-ArmstrongCF	.225	5	0	2	0	0	0	1
M. BallesterosDH	.378	0	0	0	1	0	1	0
S. Kingery3B	.250	2	0	1	0	0	0	0
Team		36	7	12	6	2	10	6

pitching box score. Tap a column header to sort by that stat; tap again to reverse, a third time to clear. The team leader in each stat is highlighted. Players who did not play are listed at the bottom.
Player
S. ImanagaSP	7.0	3	1	1	1	1	87
R. MartinRP	1.0	1	2	2	1	2	17
J. WebbRP	0.1	2	1	0	0	0	7
C. ThielbarRP	0.2	0	0	0	0	0	6
Team	9.0	6	4	3	2	3	117

Team

PHI

CHC

—

3 sub-models, blended.

Closing-line value.

CHC vs PHI.

Team rate stats vs league

The morning-after recap.

Inning by inning

Tomorrow's slate is open.

Batters

Pitchers

Batters

Pitchers

CHC vs PHI.

3 sub-models, blended.

Closing-line value.