
CHW
15-17

SD
19-12
Line movement
68 snapshots
SD spread
-1.5
open -1.5
Total
O/U 8.0
open O/U 8.5 · -0.5
SD no-vig %
57.3%
open 58.3% · -1.0
Stepped lines reflect captured market snapshots from odds_snapshots. Spread sign convention: negative = SD favored. Live mode caps the in-game branch to the last 60 minutes.
Logged before first pitch · graded in public
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
CHW
league avg
SD
.729
OPS
.718
.656
.319
OBP
.319
.293
4.66
Runs / G
4.50
3.86
4.42
Team ERA
4.18
▶3.86
1.34
WHIP
1.31
▶1.30
8.4
K / 9
8.5
8.4
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
CHW wins
CHW 8 · SD 2 (by 6)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked SD +11pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHW | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
| SD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
The receipts
-0.98
CLV pp
Open price
-156
Close price
-149
Open no-vig
58.3%
Close no-vig
57.3%
Market faded the model · Graded: miss
Logged before tip · graded in public
How we read this game
CHW · top performer

Munetaka Murakami
1B
3-1
AB-H
1
R
3
RBI
SD · top performer

Fernando Tatis Jr.
RF
3-3
AB-H
1
R
0
RBI
Biggest swing: 20pp · Top 2nd Inning
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .202 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .239 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| .214 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .237 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| .257 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .250 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .233 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .275 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .286 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |
| .178 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .243 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 32 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 87 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | |
| 1.0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 31 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 12 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 139 |
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .243 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .270 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .310 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .225 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .268 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .265 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .153 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .176 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .217 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| Team | 32 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.0 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 95 | |
| 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 34 | |
| 2.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 41 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 170 |
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
8
Hits
6
8
Runs
2
0
Errors
0
Team stats
CHW
Away
Stat
SD
Home
8
Runs
2
8
Hits
6
0
Errors
0
15
TB
9
2
HR
0
7
BB
4
5
K
5
7
LOB
11
Current series
CHW win series 2-1
Season series
CHW lead series 1-0
Model & market
Vegas line center
DraftKings via ESPN · 21+
Spread
SD -1.5
Total
8.0
Defensive · -0.5 vs avg
Moneyline
Implied probabilities back-computed from American odds — break-even win % a moneyline bet needs to be +EV.
Line movement · 68 snapshots
ESPN-tracked · 21+
Spread
1.5
0.0 since open
Total
8.0
-0.5 since open
How it ended
CHW beat SD 8-2. M. Murakami led the way — 1-for-3 · 1 HR · 1.933 OPS. Murakami's play in the top 2nd inning drove the biggest swing of the night (20pp).
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
SD vs CHW
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactMeidroth · doubled to right, Montgomery to third.
Murakami · homered to right center (413 feet), Peters scored and Romo scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHW | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
| SD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Period scoring
CHW won 2 · SD won 1
Inn 1
Inn 2
Murakami 3
Inn 3
Inn 4
Inn 5
Montgomery 1
Inn 6
Inn 7
Inn 8
Peters 1
Andujar 1
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 588 plays
End of the 9th inning
CHW 8·SD 2
· ·
CHW 8·SD 2
Johnson struck out swinging.
· ·
CHW 8·SD 2
Pitch 4 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
CHW 8·SD 2
Pitch 3 : Ball 1
· ·
CHW 8·SD 2
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Swinging
· ·
CHW 8·SD 2
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
CHW 8·SD 2
Jordan Hicks pitches to Bryce Johnson
· ·
CHW 8·SD 2
·
CHW 8·SD 2
Fermin doubled to right.
·
CHW 8·SD 2
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
·
CHW 8·SD 2
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Looking
·
CHW 8·SD 2
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CHW 8·SD 2
Jordan Hicks pitches to Freddy Fermin
·
CHW 8·SD 2
·
CHW 8·SD 2
Castellanos grounded out to third.
·
CHW 8·SD 2
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
·
CHW 8·SD 2
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CHW 8·SD 2
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
CHW 8·SD 2
Jordan Hicks pitches to Nick Castellanos
·
CHW 8·SD 2
·
CHW 8·SD 2
France grounded out to shortstop.
·
CHW 8·SD 2
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
CHW 8·SD 2
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CHW 8·SD 2
Jordan Hicks pitches to Ty France
·
CHW 8·SD 2
Hicks relieved Bido
·
CHW 8·SD 2
Acuña at shortstop.
CHW 8·SD 2
Bottom of the 9th inning
CHW 8·SD 2
Middle of the 9th inning
CHW 8·SD 2
·
CHW 8·SD 2
Betting line
SD -1.5·O/U 8·CHW +124/SD -149
Recap · MLB
hicago White Sox went into San Diego Padres and beat them, 8–2. It was a wire-to-wire rout.
CHW +1.5 cashed (SD lost outright). Total cleared the 8.0 OVER by 2.0.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
126
projections · 74 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
62.1%
ensemble · SD favored
Elo Static
61.4%
P(SD win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
61.5%
P(SD win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
61.5%
P(SD win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.05 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
100% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.