
LAD
20-12

STL
19-13
Line movement
66 snapshots
STL spread
+1.5
open +1.5
Total
O/U 8.5
open O/U 8.0 · +0.5
STL no-vig %
39.2%
open 38.4% · +0.8
Stepped lines reflect captured market snapshots from odds_snapshots. Spread sign convention: negative = STL favored. Live mode caps the in-game branch to the last 60 minutes.
Logged before first pitch · graded in public
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
LAD
league avg
STL
.783
OPS
.719
.727
.345
OBP
.319
.328
5.24
Runs / G
4.50
4.61
3.42
Team ERA
4.18
4.25
1.10
WHIP
1.31
1.34
9.0
K / 9
8.5
7.6
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
STL wins
LAD 2 · STL 7 (by 5)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked LAD +6pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAD | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| STL | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 7 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
LAD · top performer

Freddie Freeman
1B
4-2
AB-H
1
R
0
RBI
STL · top performer

Jordan Walker
RF
4-4
AB-H
2
R
2
RBI
Biggest swing: 27pp · Bottom 1st Inning
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .261 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .267 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .272 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .238 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .237 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .319 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .288 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .313 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .200 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .304 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 32 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 97 | |
| 1.1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 21 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 24 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 12 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 12 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 11 | 154 |
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .246 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .246 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .279 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| .308 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .224 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| .265 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .236 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .261 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .171 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| Team | 36 | 7 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 11 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.2 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 96 | |
| 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 25 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 17 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 154 |
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
7
Hits
12
2
Runs
7
2
Errors
0
Team stats
LAD
Away
Stat
STL
Home
2
Runs
7
7
Hits
12
2
Errors
0
9
TB
21
0
HR
2
4
BB
1
6
K
11
15
LOB
16
Current series
STL wins series 2-1
Season series
STL leads series 1-0
Model & market
Vegas line center
DraftKings via ESPN · 21+
Spread
LAD -1.5
Total
8.5
Standard · 0.0 vs avg
Moneyline
Implied probabilities back-computed from American odds — break-even win % a moneyline bet needs to be +EV.
Line movement · 66 snapshots
ESPN-tracked · 21+
Spread
1.5
0.0 since open
Total
8.5
+0.5 since open
How it ended
STL beat LAD 7-2. J. Walker led the way — 4-for-4 · 2 R · 2.000 OPS. Gorman's play in the bottom 1st inning drove the biggest swing of the night (27pp).
Win probability
STL vs LAD
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactGorman · homered to right (388 feet), Walker scored.
Muncy · doubled to center, Pages scored.
Pages · grounded into double play, pitcher to second to first, T. Hernández out at second.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAD | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| STL | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | — | 7 |
Period scoring
LAD won 2 · STL won 3
Inn 1
Gorman 3
Inn 2
Muncy 1
Inn 3
Burleson 1
Inn 4
Inn 5
Inn 6
Tucker 1
Inn 7
Walker 2
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 580 plays
· ·
LAD 2·STL 7
Ohtani flied out to center.
· ·
LAD 2·STL 7
Pitch 5 : Ball In Play
· ·
LAD 2·STL 7
Pitch 4 : Ball 1
· ·
LAD 2·STL 7
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
LAD 2·STL 7
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
LAD 2·STL 7
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
· ·
LAD 2·STL 7
Matt Svanson pitches to Shohei Ohtani
· ·
LAD 2·STL 7
·
LAD 2·STL 7
Kim doubled to left.
·
LAD 2·STL 7
Pitch 5 : Ball In Play
·
LAD 2·STL 7
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Looking
·
LAD 2·STL 7
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
·
LAD 2·STL 7
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Looking
·
LAD 2·STL 7
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
LAD 2·STL 7
Matt Svanson pitches to Hyeseong Kim
·
LAD 2·STL 7
·
LAD 2·STL 7
Rojas grounded out to first.
·
LAD 2·STL 7
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
·
LAD 2·STL 7
Pitch 3 : Strike 1 Looking
·
LAD 2·STL 7
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
·
LAD 2·STL 7
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
LAD 2·STL 7
Matt Svanson pitches to Miguel Rojas
·
LAD 2·STL 7
·
LAD 2·STL 7
Muncy flied out to center.
·
LAD 2·STL 7
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
LAD 2·STL 7
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
LAD 2·STL 7
Matt Svanson pitches to Max Muncy
·
LAD 2·STL 7
Svanson relieved Graceffo
·
LAD 2·STL 7
Top of the 9th inning
LAD 2·STL 7
Betting line
LAD -1.5·O/U 8.5·LAD -175/STL +144
Recap · MLB
t. Louis Cardinals held off Los Angeles Dodgers, 7–2.
STL +1.5 cashed (LAD lost outright). Total cleared the 8.5 OVER by 0.5.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
The receipts
+0.77
CLV pp
Open price
+149
Close price
+144
Open no-vig
38.4%
Close no-vig
39.2%
Market came to the model · Graded: hit
Logged before tip · graded in public
How we read this game
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
126
projections · 80 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
43.3%
ensemble · LAD favored
Elo Static
44.3%
P(STL win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
44.4%
P(STL win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
45.5%
P(STL win)
35%
weight
Disagreement
0.55 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
96% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.