
STL
14-10

MIA
12-13
Line movement
40 snapshots
MIA spread
-1.5
open -1.5
Total
O/U 8.5
open O/U 8.5
MIA no-vig %
58.3%
open 58.3%
Stepped lines reflect captured market snapshots from odds_snapshots. Spread sign convention: negative = MIA favored. Live mode caps the in-game branch to the last 60 minutes.
Logged before first pitch · graded in public
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
STL
league avg
MIA
.728
OPS
.718
.708
.328
OBP
.319
.322
4.63
Runs / G
4.50
4.29
4.26
Team ERA
4.18
▶4.07
1.34
WHIP
1.31
▶1.26
7.6
K / 9
8.5
▶8.8
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
MIA wins
STL 1 · MIA 4 (by 3)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked MIA +3pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MIA | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
The receipts
0.00
CLV pp
Open price
+129
Close price
+129
Open no-vig
41.7%
Close no-vig
41.7%
Line barely moved · Graded: miss
Logged before tip · graded in public
How we read this game
STL · top performer

Ivan Herrera
DH
4-1
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
MIA · top performer

Javier Sanoja
3B
4-3
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
Biggest swing: 10pp · Bottom 2nd Inning
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .218 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .230 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| .208 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .186 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .208 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .236 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| .180 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .204 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .197 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| Team | 31 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 9 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.0 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 89 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 17 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 132 |
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .179 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .330 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .315 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .321 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .227 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .179 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .225 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .273 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .352 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .185 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 34 | 4 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 56 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 13 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 13 | |
| 0.1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 12 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 112 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantSTL
MIA
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
4
Hits
12
1
Runs
4
1
Errors
1
Team stats
STL
Away
Stat
MIA
Home
1
Runs
4
4
Hits
12
1
Errors
1
8
TB
12
1
HR
0
2
BB
3
9
K
5
12
LOB
24
Current series
MIA wins series 2-1
Season series
MIA leads series 2-1
Model & market
Vegas line center
DraftKings via ESPN · 21+
Spread
MIA -1.5
Total
8.5
Standard · 0.0 vs avg
Moneyline
Implied probabilities back-computed from American odds — break-even win % a moneyline bet needs to be +EV.
Line movement · 40 snapshots
ESPN-tracked · 21+
Spread
1.5
0.0 since open
Total
8.5
0.0 since open
How it ended
MIA beat STL 4-1. J. Sanoja led the way — 3-for-4 · 1.500 OPS.
Win probability
MIA vs STL
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactFerm · ín grounded into double play, second to first, Urías out at second.
Caissie · singled to left, Ramírez scored, Hernández to second.
Marsee · walked, Hernández scored, Jiménez to second, Caissie to third.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MIA | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 4 |
Period scoring
STL won 0 · MIA won 3
Inn 1
Inn 2
Caissie 1
Inn 3
Inn 4
Marsee 1
Inn 5
Ram 1
Inn 6
Inn 7
Inn 8
Inn 9
Herrera 1
Play-by-play · 504 plays
· ·
STL 1·MIA 4
Church struck out swinging.
· ·
STL 1·MIA 4
+1pp
Pitch 8 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
STL 1·MIA 4
Pitch 7 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
STL 1·MIA 4
Pitch 6 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
STL 1·MIA 4
Pitch 5 : Ball 3
· ·
STL 1·MIA 4
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
STL 1·MIA 4
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
· ·
STL 1·MIA 4
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
STL 1·MIA 4
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
STL 1·MIA 4
Pete Fairbanks pitches to Nathan Church
· ·
STL 1·MIA 4
· ·
STL 1·MIA 4
Fermín flied out to left.
· ·
STL 1·MIA 4
+2pp
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
· ·
STL 1·MIA 4
Pitch 3 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
STL 1·MIA 4
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
· ·
STL 1·MIA 4
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
STL 1·MIA 4
Pete Fairbanks pitches to Jose Fermin
· ·
STL 1·MIA 4
Fairbanks relieved Bachar
·
STL 1·MIA 4
· ·
STL 1·MIA 4
Urías popped out to shortstop.
· ·
STL 1·MIA 4
+4pp
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
· ·
STL 1·MIA 4
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
STL 1·MIA 4
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
STL 1·MIA 4
Lake Bachar pitches to Ramon Urias
· ·
STL 1·MIA 4
·
STL 1·MIA 4
Gorman walked.
·
STL 1·MIA 4
−3pp
Pitch 5 : Ball 4
·
STL 1·MIA 4
Pitch 4 : Ball 3
·
STL 1·MIA 4
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
·
STL 1·MIA 4
Betting line
MIA -1.5·O/U 8.5·STL +129/MIA -156
Recap · MLB
iami Marlins held off St. Louis Cardinals, 4–1.
MIA -1.5 cashed (won by 3). Total stayed UNDER 8.5 by 3.5.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
123
projections · 85 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
52.0%
ensemble · MIA favored
Elo Static
52.6%
P(MIA win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
52.4%
P(MIA win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
51.1%
P(MIA win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.67 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
96% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.