
Nick King, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
Lead playmaker
Scoring
85
Playmaking
100
Defense
50
Shooting
79
Combine
Max vertical
39.0"p77
Lane agility
10.62sp88
¾ sprint
3.11sp74
Standing reach
97.5"p18
Draft outlook
Projected landing

#48
Dallas Mavericks
2nd roundModel vs the field
The One
#48
Field
#54
In line with the field — our board and the consensus agree within a couple of slots.
across 3 mock boards
Scouting summary
Lead playmaker profile. The loudest scout signal: elite bpm (BPM = 99th pct). Their NCAA dominance composite lands at 83 on a 100 scale. Mock consensus pegs them 54th across 3 boards.
Auto-generated from archetype + top deterministic chip · long-form narrative ships when the generator's AI pass is enabled.
Mock consensus over time
Draft score breakdown
avg rank 54 across 3 boards
Deterministic signals · v1 rules
Elite BPM
BPM = 99th pct
High usage + efficient
USG and TS percentiles both clear the v1 trigger
Short wingspan for position
wingspan = 9th pct
Elite playmaker (G)
AST% = 100th pct
Plus vertical
max vertical = 77th pct
Consensus risers
latest consensus improved by 9 spots
Trait grades
Combine radar · vs. G-bucket
Wingspan
med 79.8"
76.0"
p9
Standing reach
med 100.0"
97.5"
p18
Max vertical
med 36.5"
39.0"
p77
Standing vert
med 30.0"
32.0"
p73
¾ sprint
med 3.19s
3.11s
p74
Lane agility
med 11.00s
10.62s
p88
Shuttle
med 3.06s
3.10s
p44
College stats · 2025-26 season
35 games · 81% min
labeled Pure PG
Name match to Michigan St., prospect card says Michigan State — possible mid-season transfer or stale label.
Efficiency
Playmaking
Defense
Rebounding
Composite
via BartTorvik · percentiles vs G-bucket of the 2025-26 D1 pool
X-factor · Risk · Scheme fit
Long-form scouting prose ships when the generator's AI narrative pass is enabled. The deterministic chip list above carries the same information as structured signals.
Generated by deterministic-v3-ageadj-consensus · May 30, 2026