
NSH
17-17-4

UTA
18-19-3
Historical comparables
Historical comparables
No comparable NHL games in the historical pool yet.
Recap · NHL
ashville Predators went into Utah Mammoth and beat them, 4–3.
NSH +1.5 cashed (UTA lost outright). Total cleared the 5.5 OVER by 1.5.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
NSH · top performer

Steven Stamkos
C · #91
2
G
1
A
—
SOG
UTA · top performer

Dylan Guenther
RW · #11
1
G
1
A
—
SOG
NHL · Nashville Predators at Utah Mammoth · final
NHL · Box scoreEDGE


NSH
17-17-4
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Goalie | Skating | Goalie | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | GA | SA | SV | SV% |
UTA
18-19-3
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Goalie | Skating | Goalie | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | GA | SA | SV | SV% |
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
8
PIM
4
Season series
Series tied 1-1
Vegas line center
DraftKings via ESPN · 21+
Spread
UTA -1.5
Total
5.5
Defensive · -3.0 vs avg
Moneyline
Implied probabilities back-computed from American odds — break-even win % a moneyline bet needs to be +EV.
Line movement · 5 snapshots
ESPN-tracked · 21+
Spread
1.5
0.0 since open
Total
5.5
0.0 since open
How it ended
NSH beat UTA 4-3.
Last play
Game End
Linescore (quarters)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | T |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSH | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| UTA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Period scoring
NSH won 1 · UTA won 0
1
2
3
Play-by-play · 333 plays
- 3rd·20:00
Game End
NSH 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·20:00
End of 3rd Period
NSH 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·19:56
Mikhail Sergachev shot blocked by Steven Stamkos
·
NSH 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·19:54
Barrett Hayton faceoff won against Michael McCarron
·
NSH 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·19:54
Goalie Stopped
NSH 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·19:51
Dylan Guenther Snap Shot saved by Juuse Saros
·
NSH 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·19:46
Dylan Guenther shot blocked by Erik Haula
·
NSH 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·19:31
Erik Haula Snap Shot Wide Left
NSH 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·19:27
Sean Durzi shot blocked by Michael McCarron
·
NSH 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·19:24
Barrett Hayton faceoff won against Michael McCarron
·
NSH 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·19:24
Icing
NSH 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·19:18
Giveaway by Mikhail Sergachev
NSH 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·18:59
Barrett Hayton faceoff won against Michael McCarron
·
NSH 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·18:59
Goalie Stopped
NSH 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·18:57
Mikhail Sergachev Slap Shot saved by Juuse Saros
·
NSH 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·17:15
Giveaway by Erik Haula
NSH 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·17:14
Giveaway by Michael Carcone
NSH 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·16:59
JJ Peterka Snap Shot saved by Juuse Saros
·
NSH 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·16:54
Michael McCarron shot blocked by Sean Durzi
·
NSH 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·16:50
Cole Smith Backhand Wide Left
· ·
NSH 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·16:07
Dylan Guenther Slap Shot saved by Juuse Saros
·
NSH 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·15:40
Ryan O'Reilly faceoff won against Nick Schmaltz
·
NSH 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·15:40
Timeout - Home
NSH 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·15:40
Nick Perbix Cross-checking against Nick Schmaltz
·
NSH 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·15:37
Nick Schmaltz Backhand saved by Juuse Saros
·
NSH 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·15:22
Takeaway by Clayton Keller
NSH 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·15:04
JJ Peterka Wrist Shot saved by Juuse Saros
·
NSH 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·14:05
Nick Schmaltz faceoff won against Ryan O'Reilly
·
NSH 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·14:05
TV Timeout
NSH 4·UTA 3
- 3rd·14:05
Brady Skjei Tripping against Barrett Hayton
·
NSH 4·UTA 3
Team stats
NSH
Away
Stat
UTA
Home
26
Shots
31
50.0
PCT
25.0
8
PIM
4
33
Faceoffs W
37
19
Blocks
16
10
Giveaways
15
4
Takeaways
3
Betting line
UTA -1.5·O/U 5.5·NSH +120/UTA -142
NHL EDGE · Tonight’s standouts
5 of 13 skaters with EDGE
Ryan O'ReillyNSH · CDIST MI265.898
Brady SkjeiNSH · DSKATE MPH23.497
Filip ForsbergNSH · LWDIST MI246.195
Nick BlankenburgCOL · DSKATE MPH22.591
Roman JosiNSH · DDIST MI245.490
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
3 sub-models, blended.
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
50.6%
ensemble · UTA favored
Elo Static
fallback · inputs missing
50.0%
P(UTA win)
33%
weight
Goalie Starter
fallback · inputs missing
50.0%
P(UTA win)
32%
weight
Xg Blend
fallback · inputs missing
50.0%
P(UTA win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.00 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
100% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
0 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.
The receipts
Closing-line value.
0.00
CLV pp
Open price
-142
Close price
-142
Open no-vig
56.3%
Close no-vig
56.3%
Line barely moved · Graded: miss