
UTA
16-15-3

PIT
14-8-9
Historical comparables
Historical comparables
No comparable NHL games in the historical pool yet.
Recap · NHL
tah Mammoth went into Pittsburgh Penguins and beat them, 5–4 in overtime.
PIT +1.5 cashed (UTA won by 1). Total cleared the 6.5 OVER by 2.5.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
UTA · top performer

Michael Carcone
LW · #53
2
G
0
A
—
SOG
PIT · top performer

Ben Kindel
C · #81
1
G
2
A
—
SOG
NHL · Utah Mammoth at Pittsburgh Penguins · final
NHL · Box scoreEDGE


UTA
16-15-3
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Goalie | Skating | Goalie | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | GA | SA | SV | SV% |
PIT
14-8-9
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Skating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | +/- | G | A | PIM |
| Goalie | Skating | Goalie | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | GA | SA | SV | SV% |
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
4
PIM
10
Season series
UTA leads series 1-0
Vegas line center
DraftKings via ESPN · 21+
Spread
UTA -1.5
Total
6.5
Defensive · -2.0 vs avg
Moneyline
Implied probabilities back-computed from American odds — break-even win % a moneyline bet needs to be +EV.
Line movement · 7 snapshots
ESPN-tracked · 21+
Spread
1.5
0.0 since open
Total
6.5
0.0 since open
How it ended
UTA beat PIT 5-4.
Last play
Game End
Linescore (quarters)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | OT | T |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UTA | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| PIT | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
Period scoring
UTA won 2 · PIT won 2
1
2
3
OT
Play-by-play · 308 plays
- OT·0:42
Game End
UTA 5·PIT 4
- OT·0:42
End of OT
UTA 5·PIT 4
- OT·0:42
Dylan Guenther Goal (15) Wrist Shot, assists: John Marino (15)
·
UTA 5·PIT 4
- OT·0:32
Giveaway by Ben Kindel
UTA 4·PIT 4
- OT·0:00
Ben Kindel faceoff won against Kevin Stenlund
·
UTA 4·PIT 4
- OT·0:00
Start of Overtime
UTA 4·PIT 4
- 3rd·20:00
End of 3rd Period
UTA 4·PIT 4
- 3rd·19:56
Barrett Hayton faceoff won against Sidney Crosby
·
UTA 4·PIT 4
- 3rd·19:56
Icing
UTA 4·PIT 4
- 3rd·19:34
Ben Kindel faceoff won against Barrett Hayton
·
UTA 4·PIT 4
- 3rd·19:34
Puck in Benches
UTA 4·PIT 4
- 3rd·19:09
Giveaway by Parker Wotherspoon
UTA 4·PIT 4
- 3rd·19:08
Giveaway by Ian Cole
UTA 4·PIT 4
- 3rd·19:02
Sidney Crosby faceoff won against Nick Schmaltz
·
UTA 4·PIT 4
- 3rd·19:02
Icing
UTA 4·PIT 4
- 3rd·18:24
Giveaway by Ian Cole
UTA 4·PIT 4
- 3rd·18:11
Justin Brazeau hit Michael Carcone
·
UTA 4·PIT 4
- 3rd·17:19
John Marino Wrist Shot Wide Left
·
UTA 4·PIT 4
- 3rd·17:16
Dylan Guenther Wrist Shot saved by Sergei Murashov
·
UTA 4·PIT 4
- 3rd·17:13
Barrett Hayton faceoff won against Sidney Crosby
·
UTA 4·PIT 4
- 3rd·17:13
Icing
UTA 4·PIT 4
- 3rd·17:04
Clayton Keller Wrist Shot saved by Sergei Murashov
·
UTA 4·PIT 4
- 3rd·16:53
Connor Clifton hit JJ Peterka
·
UTA 4·PIT 4
- 3rd·16:45
JJ Peterka Wrist Shot saved by Sergei Murashov
·
UTA 4·PIT 4
- 3rd·16:12
Ben Kindel Wrist Shot saved by Karel Vejmelka
·
UTA 4·PIT 4
- 3rd·15:44
Rutger McGroarty hit Jack McBain
·
UTA 4·PIT 4
- 3rd·15:15
Kris Letang hit Dylan Guenther
·
UTA 4·PIT 4
- 3rd·15:15
Giveaway by Dylan Guenther
UTA 4·PIT 4
- 3rd·15:13
Rickard Rakell hit Nate Schmidt
·
UTA 4·PIT 4
- 3rd·14:52
Lawson Crouse hit Rickard Rakell
·
UTA 4·PIT 4
Team stats
UTA
Away
Stat
PIT
Home
36
Shots
16
20.0
PCT
0.0
4
PIM
10
32
Faceoffs W
32
7
Blocks
17
20
Giveaways
15
5
Takeaways
4
Betting line
UTA -1.5·O/U 6.5·UTA -130/PIT +110
NHL EDGE · Tonight’s standouts
5 of 15 skaters with EDGE
Erik KarlssonPIT · DSKATE MPH22.897
Sidney CrosbyPIT · CSHOT MPH88.787
Ben KindelPIT · CSHOT MPH87.584
Kris LetangPIT · DSHOT MPH91.775
Olli MaattaCGY · DSKATE MPH22.272
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
3 sub-models, blended.
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
50.6%
ensemble · PIT favored
Elo Static
fallback · inputs missing
50.0%
P(PIT win)
33%
weight
Goalie Starter
fallback · inputs missing
50.0%
P(PIT win)
32%
weight
Xg Blend
fallback · inputs missing
50.0%
P(PIT win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.00 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
100% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
0 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.
The receipts
Closing-line value.
0.00
CLV pp
Open price
+110
Close price
+110
Open no-vig
45.7%
Close no-vig
45.7%
Line barely moved · Graded: miss